Eric Schultz
FOSS and #DigitalAutonomy activist. Principal Software Engineer Software for Good. Engineering Lead CommitChange. Houdini Project Leader. Opinions are my own. Nonbinary. Cover photo from: https://t.co/7rVeNC
You have to be kidding me.
Here's all they'd have to do:
- Create a chatbot in an app
- Give users over 18 the normal chat bot
- Give users under 18 a chat bot where they subtly give the user more manipulative responses.
You can vibe code that now except right now, there's no way to know with certainty how old the user is. With age verification, they know for sure who to target.
One of things that many totally overlook is that reviewing AI generated code is harder. It doesn't look like regular code. It has mistakes in places that people wouldn't make. It doesn't have appropriate abstractions. You can't let your guard down like you can with a human engineer.
It's like "somewhere in this massive pile of code, there will be a mistake that not even a junior engineer would make. But no clue where!"
To be fair, I'm sure people can use GenAI to write decent code. But that requires a lot more discretion than most people are doing.
I'm thinking about the freedom fighters in Central America I met last year who told me all about the ways they were using free software to fight colonialism and oppression. It was truly some of the most amazing and inspiring work I've ever seen.
Made a (shortsighted) joke to one of them that's she's lucky she's not having to deal with the AI bubble there. She said very seriously "It's just one more way you're oppressing us".
So ya, that's what I'm most worried about.
RE: @Discourse@mastodon.social
While a commendable argument in favor of open source software in 2026, the author's claim that the cost of vulnerability scanning will "certainly go down" is absurd.
It is about as inexpensive now as it can ever be because none of these companies have had to make money yet. They're starting to need to and there's no way they can keep the prices down if they do that.
There is no comparable technology in computing history with such a high marginal cost.
It's not often I disagree with the EFF's position on something but I do here. The confounding issue is that the app stores have a monopoly on payment processing, a monopoly of their own making.
"You have hidden your face from us and have delivered us up to our iniquity."- Isaiah 64:7
Quotes from skeet and quote skeet:
"The average person doesn’t give a fuck if AI has some niche use where it actually excels if used properly. In fact, that is what a tool is *supposed* to do and none of us will have a problem if it is used like that. What we see is AI fucking up real life in a massive way."
"Telling people about the good, useful use cases for AI is kinda like telling people about the 30-50 feral hogs you need your AR-15 for
It is entirely true and yet so completely divorced from the lived experience of your audience that you sound ridiculous"
https://bsky.app/profile/divinecoffeebinge.bsky.social/post/3mjwj2awkrk2v