@Configures @LaChasseuse Not a congressman. Reagan nominated Robert Bork to the Supreme Court. Bork said he did not believe there was a Constitutional right to privacy, widely seen as a signal that he would overturn Roe v Wade.
Before his confirmation, his video rental history was leaked to the press. If he doesn't believe in a right to privacy, he has nothing to complain about, right? (Depressingly, his history was not embarrassing at all: it was all Ruthless People, and The Man Who Knew Too Much, he had very good taste in movies.)
In response, Congress passed... no, not a general right to privacy, don't be silly. They just made it illegal to leak video rental histories "or similar audio visual materials". That specific.
He did not get confirmed. The Senate actually jumped the right way that time.
From whence we get the word "borked" (which I'd always assumed was a humorous misspelling of "broke").
You may remember Robert Bork from such totally normal democratic happenings as the Saturday Night Massacre. Nixon's Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General resigned rather than fire Watergate special prosecutor Archibald Cox. Bork, as acting Attorney General, complied.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Bork