traecer

@varelse@mastodon.com.pl @Natasha_Jay@tech.lgbt "Sensible policies for a sensible Britain!"

@cwebber the grift begins anew!

@bob @gwaldby true, but so do international war crime trials

@Lana I was told by...someone...that the US doesn't use the strait! Well, it doesn't *now*...

@dos @purism had to ⭐ for the cat using Linux on a phone 😻

@huronbikes@cyberplace.social @GossiTheDog@cyberplace.social "I understood that reference!" ...which is a reference to a 14yo movie at this point.

@NorcalGma2@sfba.social Jasper looks like a distinguished fellow that would appreciate a treat for all his hard work posing for the camera 😸

@cstanhope ...but if we do that, how are we going to make billions of dollars exploiting the public?

@rjblaskiewicz @forestfern teletypes are essentially just typewriters attached to a computer...could one post to Mastodon from a teletype? 🤔

@pheonix YES, ALL THE TIME

@rbreich how did this go from $250 million in private donations to $1 billion in taxpayer funds‽ #politics #USPol

@nocontexttrek@mastodon.social tell me about it 😒

@lizzard@mastodon.social sooo tiny! 🤭😻

@mikemccaffrey@drupal.community @mhoye@cosocial.ca ⬆️ THIS!

@Slyence Sorry, I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around this... THEY THREATENED THE POPE⁉⁉⁉⁉

@pheonix so many 🚩🚩🚩

@LaquinArt @jonny @srvanderplas "I should be able to distribute with any license I want (even a proprietary one)" Nope, that's the viral nature of the GPL. If you link to GPLed code and intend to distribute your new code, it MUST be GPL as well. That way helps to ensure the FSF's idea of "software freedom" aka "copyleft". This is why the Linux kernel license has an explicit exception to GPLv2 to ensure Linux syscalls can be made by user space code without distributing the user space code under the GPL. (See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/license-rules.html) It's also one the reasons so many open/free source projects use dual licenses like Perl or Firefox, and more permissive licenses like the Apache 2.0 and MIT licenses are so popular. What you have described is the Lesser GPL (LGPL) license, and yes, code under the LGPL does NOT require your code to have any particular license, provided you distribute any changes to the original (assuming you intend to distribute the original code at all).

@kepano looks like someone forgot to fill in a template variable ☹

@archibald I have an old ragged doormat that I was going to throw out until I realized the neighbor cat that visits me loves to sit on it 😻 #NotMyCat

@jonny @srvanderplas well, IANAL, but: 1) I have published GPLed code, and AFAI Understand, if the produced code is *linked* to the GPLed code/requires the GPLed code to run, to redistribute the new code it MUST be GPLed. 2) last I checked, the US court system was of the opinion that work produced by AI was NOT COPYRIGHTABLE. AFAIK, that should include any produced code. Other jurisdictions may have differing laws.

@Richard_Littler yeah, that R5 unit is dodgy, but they keep trying to pawn it off on someone

@molly0xfff "feels like there are no consistent brand values" 🤣🤣🤣

@georgetakei he was giving a speech about foreigners interfering with Hungary's elections—literally being a foreigner interfering in Hungary's elections 🤦‍♂️

@saagar@federated.saagarjha.com Despite having C-ish syntax, Perl is also a Lisp.

@darkling@mstdn.social @mhoye@cosocial.ca Yeah, when the agent (that is not & cannot be self-aware) started referring to itself as "I", I knew both the service buyer & seller had agreed to believe in fiction only tangentally related to the real world

@jschauma@mstdn.social don't forget burning the planet down around our ears