simonbp
Linux, Railway, Beer dork; Astrophysics PhD; occasional interplanetary explorer
Ooof. Things not going well for the commercial reboost mission to Swift space telescope.
https://science.nasa.gov/blogs/swift/2026/07/28/commissioning-update-for-spacecraft-to-boost-nasas-swift/
I appreciate living in a small town that is so excited for its new bike parking (occupying what was two on street parking places outside a pizza joint) that they are having a full ribbon cutting ceremony for it next week.
I've seen a lot of stupid space startups over the years. A lot. @KO6YQ@pnw.zone can attest that at least half the ideas at Space Access circa 2010 were extremely dumb (and that was part of the fun!).
But believe me when I say this is the second* dumbest space startup idea I've ever heard.
*Number one was a one way trip to Mars in a modified Curiosity rover
Yup.
Boeing thought they could (because they were taught they could) submit a half baked design and NASA would throw infinite money at it to make it work. Dragon was a life-or-death program for SpaceX, so they put the effort into making it work from the start.
And now one might argue that SpaceX is now in that position, expecting that NASA will throw infinite money at them to get Starship to work...
https://spacenews.com/report-links-starliner-problems-to-overconfidence-and-unrealistic-schedules/
The problem of making a decent refreshing lager in the summer and having it on keg is that it's easy to drink a bit too much.
This is the most important thing that so few outside the space industry seem to understand: Low Orbital Constellations Are Not Permanent Infrastructure.
They cost an awful lot to launch and only last a few years. This is not a problem that SpaceX solved, they just spent absurd amounts of money launching a constellation so they could sell it off to to suckers for more the the launch cost before the depreciation kicks in. It's just old fashioned shady business.
Not bad for municipal fireworks, a week early to deconflict with the neighbors.