Engineer, founder, organizer.
Let's put people back in control of their technology. The Open Social Web is a good start. Also wondering aloud where we are taking this planet.
Check out my home page for more info and links.
tfr
Wow. I don't think the US tech industry has quite grasped how big this is.
https://www.techpolicy.press/almost-two-thirds-of-europeans-back-replacing-us-tech-poll-finds/
I want to applaud @rose.bsky.team and @mellifluousbox@mastodon.social for appearing on stage together and expressing a desire to cooperate. As I've said for a long time, #Bluesky and #Mastodon, #ActivityPub and #ATProtocol should not be fighting each other. The real opposition are the oligarch-controlled, enshittified, manipulating major commercial platforms. We have no chance of making a dent into their dominance if the revolution fights itself instead.
Congratulations to the #mastodon team for getting a substantial grant from the #sovereigntechagency !
https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2026/04/sovereign-tech-agency-funding/
The question is some variation of: is it possible to construct an organization that can pay its employees well, that can raise money that wants a financial return, that reliably delivers an innovative open social web application to lots of happy users, and is structurally incapable of enshittifying or screwing its users down the road? Even if private equity makes a takeover bid or the key people in the organization turn evil? 2/3
Defederation. Not defenestration. Don't mix those up, people.
Another nugget from a FediForum discussion:
"things are hard cause they are better :0" (by @wjmaggos@liberal.city)
Attempting to create a screw thread with OpenSCAD and ChatGPT. ChatGPT only proposes things that do not work, and when pointed out, mansplains that obviously the previous approach was never going to work. It gets a bit tiring after going through this for the fifth time, with the proposed solutions getting ever more convoluted. Gave up, need to do it myself.
P.S. What's the correct term instead of "mansplaining" when the machine talks down to itself from 5 minutes ago?
Newsmast have updated their website. Worthwhile reading if you are interested in the future of the #fediverse and the #opensocialweb. IMHO. https://newsmastfoundation.org/
"I find it amusing how Alexis used the term "lured"... lured to the fediverse... how subversive"
From a chat transcript of a FediForum session, @julian about @alexisbushnell@toot.wales
$100 million for Bluesky? A year ago? What the …
https://bsky.social/about/blog/03-19-2026-series-b
Did you know there is an award for cool open social web software coming up? With actual prize money of EUR 10,000?
Deadline is May 1.
I'm told 16 submissions are in so far.
With great thanks to our friends at New Public to who have made this possible. (I'm on the jury.)
Math literacy is the kind of thing that exists on other planets, maybe?
“As the conflict with Iran intensifies, the world’s energy arteries are constricting to a point of “nonlinearity,” where every day the Strait of Hormuz remains closed doesn’t just double the economic pain — it multiplies it exponentially.”
https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/09/business/oil-iran-strait-navy-economy
Mastodon is inviting community stakeholders from within and beyond Mastodon to weigh in on the future of the product in a 5 day sprint!
https://app.hi.events/event/7599/mastodon-discovery-week-2026
Hey, computer science people. Is there an established CS term for "the shape of data" or "the gestalt of data" in the context of:
I want to represent certain facts, and can do this in a variety of ways, like as relational tables, or as a tree, or normalized and not normalized and indexed every which way, but all of these are equivalent in terms of what facts they represent.
How do I ask, for example: which of those ... is the best for my application?






