Wanja
mastodon 4.7.3Linux enjoyer
Nazi hackers fuck off
he/him
@allpurposemat@mastodon.gamedev.place If you're talking about the Thaler v. Perlmutter case, the interpretation that they ruled AI output as "public domain" is a serious misunderstanding, widely reported by sensationalist media.
All the courts did was decline to register copyright in the name of an AI "author". However:
- Copyright registration is optional, copyright itself is enforceable without registration.
- They didn't say anything about the status of the works in question, and definitely not that they're public domain.
- It's my reading that this was thrown out on a technicality, because Thaler tried to have the AI be the legal copyright holder, which the law does not permit (it must be a human). It's very possible that the slop would have been copyright-registered had Thaler put himself as the author.
In my view, the jury is still very much out on this, and I would caution against using LLM-created code as if it were public domain.
@giggls@karlsruhe-social.de @zerforschung@chaos.social Hey das ist jetzt nicht ganz fair, es gibt schließlich noch
- SQL injection
- Stored XSS
- Alle Daten sind auf einem öffentlichen S3 bucket
@whitequark@social.treehouse.systems Why is the blog post giving AI though
OsmAnd's HH-Routing is more than just an algorithm; it's a testament to innovative problem-solving.
@lcamtuf@infosec.exchange Idk, I could actually see them nerf their old models as they release new ones, to make the comparison more favorable. Apple does the same to older iPhones via firmware updates.