Pusher Of Pixels (old account)

@Jakeout@mastodon.social @jake@fediverse.jarv.is @jensimmons@front-end.social reputable places won't do that. There are issues with a federated system that will be hiccups, compared with a seamless single silo, no argument there. But it really is a pretty well thought out system I think. Built in flexibility on many fronts. And as for accounts, people had multiple Twitter accounts, no different here

@piccolbo@toot.community @Jakeout@mastodon.social @chipchirp@ioc.exchange Another private silo isn't the correct answer. Federated, distributed is the solution. Literally what email is, but for social media

@design_law@mastodon.social likes are good but don't increase the visibility of the post. To me a like here is a personal acknowledgement of thx. You have to Boost if you want anyone else to see it. The problem is that #mastodon fundamentally changed what the *vast* majority of ppl think it means to 'Like' something. Don't call it the same thing as something but then make it different.

@arossp@mastodon.social @junecasagrande@mastodon.social @Popehat@mastodon.social the problem is that libertarianism says we should generally leave things alone. Which ignores the centuries of systemic damage done. You didn't do the damage but most white people have benefited from it, and damn near all POC/minorities have been punished by it. And the systemic racism in the system now. I don't see libertarian plans to address that. And *that* is directly in favor of the white male. To not pay for the damage his group has caused.

@lowqualityfacts@mstdn.social Threads, Twitter, BlueSky: sike! We don't need to ask actually

@hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchange you can have NoScript when you pry it from my cold insecure fingers

@mac@jawns.club I'll add another. I just had emergency surgery and because I work from home, I"ll be back working a full 3 days earlier. This is entirely my choice, but if I had to drive or even bus/train to an office I'd be taking at least a couple more days off.

@shriramk@mastodon.social @chipchirp@ioc.exchange @piccolbo@toot.community @Jakeout@mastodon.social Yep agreed, it's something to deal with. I suspect there will be consolidation into larger instance providers, like there was with email over time. I really do feel like this is the same thing with very early email providers...but with the added complexity of shared/hosted info and the far more litigious environment of the modern era. One additional factor is there isn't a central place to file those lawsuits either. It's 1000s of small disperse ones

@RedCanoe@social.snorklr.com @jake@fediverse.jarv.is @Jakeout@mastodon.social @jensimmons@front-end.social Oh snap!

@scottjshapiro except for Tuberville... Who should be in a vat of liquid nitrogen

@akareilly this but with espresso's

@yordansic@mastodon.online *somebody* got all holier than thou and claimed I totally said something I didn't. Then retreated to "It was heavily implied"...so it *wasn't* actually said? Stay in school kids.

@puddleofchaos@kolektiva.social @design_law@mastodon.social Whatever, you literally proved my point.

@puddleofchaos@kolektiva.social @design_law@mastodon.social then we're agreed almost all modern social media users rightly expect a 'favorite' to be visible based on Twitter, FB, YT insta etc. Thanks.

@darth@mastodon.online right there with you! There are some instances that run a diff version that allow it. I think they'll have to eventually. You don't ban hammers because idiots don't know how to 🪛 (looks around and plethora of idiots...ok, maybe not the best analogy)

@shriramk@mastodon.social @chipchirp@ioc.exchange @piccolbo@toot.community @Jakeout@mastodon.social Indeed. It's like email was in the beginning, lots of small independent servers and a very less threatening legal landscape. but it's also not like email in that, as you note, there is 'hosted' information subject to legal takedown notices, etc. Non-trivial, but also, not at all insurmountable.

@johngbell95@mastodonapp.uk @jensimmons@front-end.social @Jakeout@mastodon.social @jake@fediverse.jarv.is exactly! Just amazing how easily we all just fell into private silos of info control, vs your own personal feed curated by yourself

@KlinLA@mastodon.coffee @piccolbo@toot.community @Jakeout@mastodon.social @chipchirp@ioc.exchange hashtags and boosts/follows are how you build your own feed. Definitely different than having an algorithm build it for you.

@chipchirp@ioc.exchange @bossandnova@sfba.social @piccolbo@toot.community @Jakeout@mastodon.social very valid concerns. Saving your content is always something that you likely need to be proactive about if you need to ensure it's preserved. But you can change instances pretty easily and it mostly automatically updates your followers to your new address. If you stick with medium or larger instances you'll likely not run into the tyrant HOA leader issue. /1

@chipchirp@ioc.exchange @bossandnova@sfba.social @piccolbo@toot.community @Jakeout@mastodon.social posts are a trickier issue. Links to posts would break if they moved servers (like a news article reference). Not sure what the solution might be /2x

@piccolbo@toot.community @Jakeout@mastodon.social @chipchirp@ioc.exchange ah, interesting, the posts I'd seen described it as a site /Twitter competitor. Glad to see the description you linked! Interoperable with ActivityPub is a good goal. Tho I'm guessing Elmo isn't going to make Twitter interoperate now lol.

@llebrun@mastodon.social @Gargron@mastodon.social The *really* big instances are going to have major problems with this. No income stream and moderating 100,000s of users? no way in heck that's sustainable. Switching to a smaller, better managed instance really is the reasonable solution. Reduces the problem chance of it happening to you while the systems scale and settle. also happened here: https://mastodon.online/@DevinCow/109385269930065020

@flup@mastodon.scot Hey now, Musk shot (his own foot) first!

@sherold@mastodon.online where is this from?

@chipchirp@ioc.exchange @bossandnova@sfba.social @piccolbo@toot.community @Jakeout@mastodon.social a blog is a website which is federated and distributed via the public/open HTTP protocol. Whether you make your own website public or private is a separate consideration to my thinking.

@JonGretar@fosstodon.org @falcon@mindly.social @design_law@mastodon.social well that's not my experience, and since it was something you had to do explicitly...that says most people didn't. In any event, my point is ppl need to Boost if they want things to have more visibility.

@bossandnova@sfba.social @piccolbo@toot.community @chipchirp@ioc.exchange @Jakeout@mastodon.social you can't be both federated/distributed and a private silo.

@wpalmer@fosstodon.org @Jakeout@mastodon.social @jake@fediverse.jarv.is @jensimmons@front-end.social I think your conflating separate issues. There's behavioral issues you aren't going to solve and some technical things that would be useful as well. The issue here was the former, and protocols don't solve that. They can attempt to mitigate it, but it's a hammer driving a screw.

@chipchirp@ioc.exchange @piccolbo@toot.community @Jakeout@mastodon.social yes that's very possible. By 'private' in this case I mean a private company run site. You aren't allowed to run your own. A user could have a business account and a personal account on most any instance they want, like email. Or they could run their own instance too but as you note that's a bit more work.

@wpalmer@fosstodon.org @Jakeout@mastodon.social @jake@fediverse.jarv.is @jensimmons@front-end.social Same goes for email. Comms protocols don't deal with system mgmt issues.

@design_law@mastodon.social muting this since people alternating between pedantic and outright hostile

@yordansic@mastodon.online Serious question, is English not your first language? "You have to Boost IF you want anyone else to see it." That's not saying people are obligated to boost anything. That's stating a simple fact that if you want other people to see the post, it requires boosting it, a favorite will not do that.

@falcon@mindly.social @design_law@mastodon.social it is so I'm wrong on that. As evidence by your and the other posters stmt that most social media has been doing it the way I'm describing for years... I believe my point is valid. That it was done differently a decade ago is irrelevant to switching *now*. It's still a switch. This is *meant* to be social. Here boosting is the way to do that whereas favorting won't

@arossp@mastodon.social @junecasagrande@mastodon.social @Popehat@mastodon.social And he'd be in the minority today...by a wide margin.

@UncleDuke1969@universeodon.com @Waitnwallflower@beige.party

@falcon@mindly.social @design_law@mastodon.social There is no *correct* way. As you agreed, the basic behavior here changed from the system where majority of users here came from. It's a change and significantly different.

@wpalmer@fosstodon.org @Jakeout@mastodon.social @jake@fediverse.jarv.is @jensimmons@front-end.social How would that prevent a bad acting instance host from behaving badly?

@piccolbo@toot.community @chipchirp@ioc.exchange @bossandnova@sfba.social @Jakeout@mastodon.social one issue is that it's dependent on 3rd parties to use the perm links. But in this case it's moving the source from one server to another along with replies and all the other stuff too. Not sure if your old instance keeps your posts as readonly or not. Smaller instances might be possible but for larger ones probably too much to handle. Basically if you need it saved, be proactive!

@sherold@mastodon.online thx. Was wondering what show it is, who the woman is?