Gabe

@woe2you @catdad @neauoire @alderwick "Automobile" could have been a cute "ipsokinete".

@mcc@mastodon.social @airakose@mastodon.gamedev.place ooh, so an artefact like an enchanted bowl or whatever are essentially a compiled spell, where you'd better know what optimisations and what platform settings were used.

@Bundesregierung@social.bund.de passt gut zu Tempo 30. Wann fängt das nochmal an?

@jens@social.finkhaeuser.de @ludicity@mastodon.sprawl.club @iris_meredith@mastodon.social Maybe (re-)read "Small Gods", for more pleasing cause/effect perspective and cleric/gid relationship. Or just because it's a good book.

@ancoghlan ... Only for the recipient to click on the "summarise with AI" button and waste yet more CPU cycles to get back a couple of bullet points (that may or may not resemble the meeting).

@secretsquirrel @cstross seem straightforward. "aceeeeghiimmnnrtw" is "greenwich mean time", but in order.

@denny @KathyReid specifically when Google added behaviour-based ad targeting was a huge inflection point, yes. Underlying accelerant was and is the US American cancerous idea that corporations are "persons" beyond the ability to hold credit and/or debt, and thus have rights beyond some basic property ones. In a legal framework set up to favour the richer party to any dispute, this ensures the ratchet only ever goes one way. It would have helped, and could still help, if at any point European leadership decided that between them they have at least one functional vertebra.

@natural20@mastodon.ie the wonderful people of this amazing country have chosen fantastic presidents for over thirty years now. (Alas, they have been electing the most terrible gobshites as their government for as long and longer...)

@catgirlfingies I'm pretty sure @lisamelton knows some of them :)

@Golem nein, hinter dem Link geht's nicht zur Umfrage, sondern zu einem kurzen Anreißer, der im Wesentlichen dasselbe sagt wie dieser Tröt. Und von dort geht ein Link "zur Umfrage", aber das habe ich nicht mehr ausprobiert, weil ich mir schon veralbert vorkam. Baut bitte mit am Web für Menschen, weniger am Web für Statistiken.

@xahteiwi FWIW, the course builder project's home page starts with "[t]his page has been archived for historical reference sake. engEDU is no longer actively working on these projects", and the list of "our courses" have all been upgraded to 404-compliance. So I guess the answer is "not on purpose"?

@xahteiwi my reference is the internal project site and the project's internal source repo; the last public code (very python 2) lives at http://github.com/google/coursebuilder-core

@cstross @secretsquirrel I have a beginner's version, with labelled digits.

@amymagdalena @moof @quixoticgeek @wfk as long as you remember that's an ape, not a monkey, you might keep your arms. Unless you stick them out the window.

@gmh but that's the point, no? Absent the existence of external reference points, nevertheless some points must be defined as the border between one thing and the other, and the idiom makes the underlying arbitrariness of the specific choice quite clear. Age of consent / maturity is an obvious example, in each of its specifics. Ten is too early, thirty perhaps a bit late, but e.g. for drinking beer, Germany says 16, the UK 18, the USA 21. Lines in the sand, nevertheless legally quite strict.

@cunobaros that is very cool. Next round: what is the level gap? (It's a question my employer has very carefully not been answering for years, surely they have nothing to hide?)

@viktor have you considered listing salary ranges (and bonus schemes, if any)? I'm sure that could save a lot of time Also, you specify that teams are distributed, maybe note which countries?

@vampirdaddy @isotopp @masek streiche DNSSEC, setze FTZ

@stooge@438punk.house I don't know that I can say anything to help. It is hard. It will stay hard. Focus on the three goals of parenting: when they grow to adulthood, they should a) be alive, b) not be in prison, c) know you love them. Everything beyond that is a bonus. In the hardest times, focus on (c). It measures success.

@mattblaze@federate.social what mechanism would govern one or two states' results being so obviously disrupted that they can't be verified? Is there an explainer for this kind of contingency you can point to that's reasonably correct? Or is there simply no plan, and it's just whichever states manage to send electors, that's it? (Edit: autocorrecto)

@mattblaze@federate.social thank you.

@stiefkind@mastodon.social Was hältst du vom klassischen Füller?

@ThePiGuy24@meemu.org the orange one is fire.

@whitequark@social.treehouse.systems @glyph@mastodon.social "major version changes when existing tests are updated"?