#maths
35 posts · Last used 3d

What is your answer to 18÷3x2=? Boosts appreciated No, this isn't a trick question. An oft-cited blog has made the claim that "most humans" will get the wrong answer, which I think is a completely ridiculous claim, so I want hard data on the split. Unlike some other polls I've run, I want #teacher
what if... one could construct a low precision #MandelbrotSet orbit corresponding to a specific high precision orbit, without doing any high precision calculations?
I'm experimenting with constructing "tuned" periodic orbits by a simple algorithm (cycle one orbit, replacing the periodic 0 with successive values from a second orbit; scaled by Julia size of the first orbit, then iterate backwards with Newton's method to fix it up to be less approximate)
seems to work in some simple cases, in other cases the refinement pushes it to a wrong orbit*, so I think my initialization is wrong. plotting the images after each step of Newton refinement shows it takes some bonkers path instead of moving smoothly from the approximate to the accurate....
- e.g. in attached video I specified to go to the same side relative to the mini each time, but it doesn't do that...