Mikalai

@ianRobinson@mastodon.social @zlatko@social.zlatko.dev @thomasfuchs@hachyderm.io Right, I didn't see "reinstitute wealth tax" in the article. How strange. Apparently some cow are kept.

@hfalcke@mastodon.social @troed@swecyb.com @david_chisnall@infosec.exchange For good devs, let me count myself here, claiming opinion weight, ... for good devs it is still an option to produce more code. Good developer is not necessarily a paranoid (in a good sense) reviewer, and may allow garbage to pass if it works. Good dev might be a good reviewer.

@troed@swecyb.com If best description is "thinking", how come it can't already write an OS for non-programmer? This isn't the best description. Tools never seen - it doesn't see the tool. Else you could point me to part doing seeing/understanding. It isn't there. @david_chisnall@infosec.exchange @hfalcke@mastodon.social

@mudasobwa@mastodon.social There is this nuance with all these nerds. They may be convinced only by data from reality, and almost never by words. Sidenote: it makes them good lab-coats. The best and may be only way is to show inputs to chatbot, whole story, outputs, and then link to were this code in public OSS project. Precise lines/files. Either your example will teach them how to promt correctly, or, ... @pndc@social.treehouse.systems @baldur@toot.cafe

@frontenddogma@mas.to @ludicity@mastodon.sprawl.club Brutal quote: When someone tells me they are using AI for something when they really shouldn’t be, I smile and nod as long as they are unlikely to get themselves killed. Even family. Especially family.

@CountHoldem@mastodon.social @nixCraft@mastodon.social Sodium is best for grid batteries.

@CountHoldem@mastodon.social Key word is "suppose". And "suppose" should clear the scientific level first. Then practical and economical.

@darkuncle@infosec.exchange I have question, is Clouflare is making only PQ or a hybrid approach, PQ+[likes_of_ECC] ? From back and forth with IETF WG, hybrid approach is recommended, but PQ only is RECOMENDED=N RFC, till quantum computers actually arrive, and can actually break likes of ECC.

@thvv@social.vivaldi.net @tao@mathstodon.xyz I find that different forms and different angles help to form mental model of "that", whatever it is.

@troed@swecyb.com MCP servers -> add actual data to hope for better guesses. Intermingle with parsers that check correctness of other guesses. All of these are like force vectors that push guesses, mold guesses. But there are no models there. You head had many. If llm had models, it would stick to them instead of being on a wind of next token train/generator, what we call in humanized way, halucinations (thank marketing for misleading). @david_chisnall@infosec.exchange @hfalcke@mastodon.social

@JimmyB@mas.to @GeofCox@climatejustice.social Pardon me. I have assume that you are one of those normal people, i.e. not into physics types. My question is how do we fix this thing that has just happened. On one hand, people are not interested in details. On another, lack of details, and historic knowledge about details, will bring your "good intentions" into wrong place. This has been exploited. Like with nuclear debate. My question is what do I tell to normal person to snap them into more informed position? What and how?

@JimmyB@mas.to @GeofCox@climatejustice.social Why precise details come to normal person as confrontational? You have this reaction. You can reflect on it better. And hopefully share.

@zerkman@pouet.chapril.org @loke@functional.cafe @troed@swecyb.com On the last point, what about building a skill of making deeper models, .... by brain that evolved to conserve metabolic resources. Ask yourself, get a really deep dive into yourself asking what helped you to make mental models? If you have a kid, would you take from him/her possibility to have these formative experiencies? These are long term questions

@dev@discuss.systems Yes, ... in this economy

@feld@friedcheese.us Lucky

The only problem with long hair is long gray hair.

@JimmyB@mas.to @GeofCox@climatejustice.social I think I left a productive question. I hope you'll come to it.

@JimmyB@mas.to @GeofCox@climatejustice.social Humanity

@JimmyB@mas.to @GeofCox@climatejustice.social And, I focused that remark regarding event was counter productive to a general implied desire to have less CO2, to not have these heatwaves. Where was the point missed?

@JimmyB@mas.to @GeofCox@climatejustice.social Ok. Opened your stated profile. No physics. Green, left, even Brit, so, all feeling were correct. Even on taxes. And enterpreneur, so, you should be giving classes about manipulations that happen when people are dropped into false choices.

@JimmyB@mas.to @GeofCox@climatejustice.social More so on details and nuances. Thus French installations are exemplary in comparison to those in USSR. Mu-uch better.

@JimmyB@mas.to @GeofCox@climatejustice.social Actually, "status quo nuclear", and "forget nuclear" both don't allow work on nuclear to cleanup existing mess. And you mention grandkids? I sense inconsistency here.

@hfalcke@mastodon.social Unfortunately, guesses are picked up as gospels, or more or less good advice from human pro. But it is a guess without modicum of check with reality. Do you know why all of a sudden these agentic things are good with coding, like json output? Injected parsers. Read injected reality checks. But. Without nuances of implementation public is sold that there is an improvement of an underlying LLM guesser. The smoke is the problem. @troed@swecyb.com @david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

@JimmyB@mas.to @GeofCox@climatejustice.social Which key point? Waste? ... I have introduced tslking about cycles. Which other point? Centralization of big heat exchange? Me too. Which other point? I don't read your mind.

@ArthurClemens@todon.nl @nixCraft@mastodon.social @tdp_org@mastodon.social These are much smaller operations, which translates into margins.

@moelassus@mastodon.social @nixCraft@mastodon.social Novice users are too novice to weep 🫣

@JimmyB@mas.to @GeofCox@climatejustice.social Interesting. I mention fuel cycles, i.e. relevant details, to which you say that you haven't understand it. If you know about how"status quo" industry did, good, I just don't see how actions in social realm make better nuclear impossible.

@johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz @maxpool@mathstodon.xyz Haven't we seen students writting slop decades before? That student did have a mental model of a problem at hand, and didn't want to form it. Output was slop. It didn't have too many words to fool TA's. Slope nonetheless. Is it more productive to talk about mental model in one's head? Don't want it, ala vibe coding. Want to form it, how one motivates own brain?

@JimmyB@mas.to @GeofCox@climatejustice.social I respectfully ask for your appologies after this.

@troed@swecyb.com As a human, when we do that "inference" we also train on the way. Note that LLMs don't do that. We are seriously projecting humanized view on this Neural Networks, into which lots of Internet's content was condensed/distilled into. Heck, please point me to place with explicit model of anything in LLMs. You, a human, have it. LLMs just don't have this code. These are Large Language Condensates. Very good for guessing. @david_chisnall@infosec.exchange @hfalcke@mastodon.social

@JimmyB@mas.to @GeofCox@climatejustice.social My priority is grandkids. Accidental "throwing baby away with water" is what I don't like. Grandkids also need high levels of life standard. This needs energy. Actually, lot's of processes are toxic and/or use lot's of materials, or alternatively need ton of energy. Removing non-CO2 options is counter-productive in a long run.

@sineai_hq@mastodon.social A choice, a decision made without data, just on someone's vibes. Simple page can always be a PoC for more engaged implementation.

@JimmyB@mas.to @GeofCox@climatejustice.social and appology. At this point you know that you are doing ad-hominems. I wonder how many people have you pushed away from green and left ideas.

@troed@swecyb.com Right. I forgot that they give their very particular definition of "emergent". Can't you see, that when a word with common sense, loaded common sense is used, but, redefined, ... it feels like placing your address beyond the boundary of an array. Get yourself a hook into the rest of the system. Is this from UK? Do gentlemen do this? @david_chisnall@infosec.exchange @hfalcke@mastodon.social

@troed@swecyb.com This whole agentic craze is simple. Have guessers producing outputs/guesses in some perpendicular way. Intersection produces better guess. @david_chisnall@infosec.exchange @hfalcke@mastodon.social

@p3ter@mastodon.social @nixCraft@mastodon.social 🤣 Poly-cloud means three invoices on one S3 bucket.

@troed@swecyb.com Curious if you are using llm for this. If you do, curious to see

• what you put in, prompts, contexts
• what llm outputs
• what and how much you had to change it

@cstross@wandering.shop Is main 1996 feature/aspect

• a particular form or
• a power distribution, aka no monopolies in 96, simpler relationships, etc.?

@JimmyB@mas.to @GeofCox@climatejustice.social And, what if you are throwing a baby with bath water. I have a question. What allowed Ukraine industry to work in current war, i.e. getting dense amount of energy? You guessed it, the rest of nuclear plants, and not "green russian gas" that has been flowing into EU through Ukraine's pipe till last year, if details are correct. Ah, details.