jaark

@zackwhittaker@mastodon.social @lorenzofb@infosec.exchange I don't see why i's a tricky question. An LLM is just a piece of software that the operator does not fully understand and failed to configure appropriately. If I used a traditional vulnerability scanner (a tool that I sorta but do not completely know exactly what it's doing) and I make a mistake and it interferes with another person's system, I am clearly responsible. The same should lie with the operator(s) of an LLM.

@fesshole@mastodon.social doesn't that actually most inconvenience other border officers more than anyone else? They are the ones needing to find the entry stamp or a blank page.

@spytfyre@mastodon.scot @MaryAustinBooks@mstdn.social I can't be sure but I think he must have described it as his armour at some point. I don't have a problem with him having to wear his human disguise in parliament and can't wait to watch him strike down the bullshit and rhetoric that frequently comes out of politicians mouths.

@Vivaldi@social.vivaldi.net To on desktop, bottom on mobile.

@GossiTheDog@cyberplace.social bin for the win!

@zackwhittaker@mastodon.social Surely there should be criminal proceedings, never mind just sueing.

@caseyjennings @jeff @MHowell @raiderrobert @pluralistic Yeah, there's a big difference between suddenly having to pay to use the air con and something that is genuinely an ongoing service with costs. My car came with a three year subscription to GPS map updates, traffic trolleys etc. I can see that such things have an upkeep cost and so didn't mind too much about paying the subscription when that came to an end.

@cstross@wandering.shop @coral@empty.cafe Ahh, that makes more sense.. and I can see the temptation to do stupid things in a car in an unsupervised test-drive would be high for some people.

@BenjaminHCCarr maybe calling llms and their ilk 'ai' is part of the problem. Because of that label, people believe that they think, and compare them to ai characters portrayed in stories. The use of such terminology causes the llm to reproduce tokens related to 'ai' from their learning corpus stolen from hundreds of sci fi stories. Of popular fiction had their ai characters commonly playing hopscothc, that action is what they would be outputting.

@mattblaze@federate.social I totally agree, one of the biggest and most successful bits of the lol marketing scan is the choice of terms indicating intelligence or some kind of life in the machine. it's not even a bug, LLMs are intentionally non-deterministic and so random outputs should be expected. If sometime shoots a gun into the air and accidentally killed someone, the bullet didn't 'go rogue'. The shooter should be prosecuted. Same principal applies here imo.

@anon_opin@mastodon.social that tells me that you throw away fat too many clothes. .. Or I wear fat to many old clothes.

@mjg59@nondeterministic.computer if this thing weren't played out on public court records, I'd think you were a fantasist writing stuff too drawn out and far fetched to appear in a soap opera.

@ephemeromorph@topspicy.social @anon_opin@mastodon.social you can pay to keep a number and put it on your next car. Plus there are a large number with vanity plates that are transferred when they change cars. But for the vast majority numbers are not reused.