Remote
Dan
@meph@social.treehouse.systems
mastodon 4.6.7+glitch-thAn antifascist network engineer who dabbles in systems, software, and information security stuff.
Current hobbies: playing piano and screwing with radios (HAM and ISM).
Opinions and views shared here are my own and are not representative of my employer or any other organizations that I volunteer for.
242 Followers
220 Following
31 Posts
Joined April 06, 2022
pronouns:
he/him/his
location:
Seattle, WA
callsign:
WI7FI
Replying to
@sash@hachyderm.io This is incredible, fantastic work @sash@hachyderm.io
Not sure if you saw a week or so ago, but some folks in the PNW figured out you could just @everyone in the meshcore public channel and it would cause a bunch of monitor bots on a bunch of discord servers to massping.
Replying to
@whitequark@social.treehouse.systems @lina@vt.social on a very serious note, why in the world would lina owe you anything for simply sharing her perspective? I generally think you have good takes, but this just looks insane from my PoV.
SUS
this would actually be the funniest (and saddest) rugpull in history
Replying to
The term "crash out" is an unhelpful and overly nebulous term that is rife with misuse. This can create unnecessary conflict, especially in community settings where moderation sometimes must occur. In some circumstances, it can perpetuate or escalate ongoing harm in communities by "minimizing" a serious conduct violation, or in other cases, by "maximizing" a minor social indiscretion.
Rather than saying that someone is "crashing out", we need to start naming and shaming specific harmful behaviors that those individuals are participating in.
When someone is accused of "crashing out", ask for specifics.
Instead of saying that someone is "crashing out", provide details.
I know this requires extra work, and sometimes painful emotional labor to recount and record abusive situations, but it will result in a net accountability benefit for us all, which leaves everyone less vulnerable to being taken advantage of by abusers.
(DISCLAIMER: This is a subtoot about the entirety of a specific situation I am personally involved in. I am not claiming to have followed my own advice here, however I certainly wish that I had figured this out sooner. To be crystal clear, this toot is not directed at any one person individually. I am not looking to cause conflict with this toot; I am merely sharing some general observations, and what I personally have learned from them.)
Replying to
@Viss@mastodon.social it'll be the greatest DAO you've ever seen! there's been nothing like it!
@zekjur weird little footguns
Replying to
@mosssupply @robotmlg you'd be surprised. in certain situations, you do not wanna get in a bucks way.
also deer go through windshields a lot and and up inadvertently fucking people up for getting too close
Replying to
@ernmander@squatch.online didn't sarah connor technically benefit from an AI for a bunch of that story?
Replying to
@sdwilsh@social.ridetrans.it @nullagent@partyon.xyz that is on 500KHz SF7, RTT halved when we tried SF5
Replying to
@benjojo@benjojo.co.uk what the hell! I saw someone else posting about this a few days ago and I thought it was a joke!!!
Replying to
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz uhh... accidental quote.. toot... reply? what a fascinating feature 👀
Replying to
@azonenberg@ioc.exchange what do you mean by "packages" within a waveform? is this just like "data bursts" in a serial protocol or something?
Replying to
@azonenberg@ioc.exchange ok fair, so you're basically doing an L1 packet capture, then restructuring the data, or at least seeing if doing so is possible?
Replying to
@azonenberg@ioc.exchange 💯 yeah makes sense
the signal being legible is one thing, but "clean" is another 😃
Replying to