Yesterday Digital Science's #Altmetric has added #Bluesky as a new attention source for published research outputs. However, #Mastodon is not in the list of sources, and #Twitter / #X is still there...
Remote
Hanna Shmagun
@hannaSH@mastodon.social
mastodon 4.8.0-nightly.2026-10-06#openscience; #openaccess; #scholcomm; #copyright; #openinfrastructures; #researchassessment
Open Science Project Officer at UNESCO HQ.
PhD in Science & Technology Policy from #Korea (KISTI); #RDA Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG co-chair
Opinions are my own unless otherwise stated
0 Followers
0 Following
8 Posts
Joined April 24, 2024
Replying to
@mizoraman @jeroenbosman @brembs @HeidiSeibold @carlmalamud @openscience @vijaybarve@fosstodon.org @vijaybarve @omshivaprakash @shrini @sortee
1/
It depends on which elements your institute wants to include in this policy (e.g., focus on data, software, or including open access to publications as well). Some research institutes/universities prefer developing separate policies for Data, Software, Open Access…, rather than having all these different elements in a single policy.
🧵
Replying to
@mizoraman@mastodon.social
In terms of a comprehensive Open Science policy covering multiple elements, I like the approach of the NASA SPD-41a policy that covers OA publications, data and software https://shorturl.at/m6KSb This policy could also serve as a model in terms of its clear language about which Open Science practices are mandatory and which are merely recommended (e.g., see Section II.H on p.4).
It is complemented with a detailed Guidance (https://shorturl.at/R4cSb) and FAQ (https://shorturl.at/Pr1Lc)
Replying to
@mizoraman @jeroenbosman @brembs @HeidiSeibold @carlmalamud @openscience @vijaybarve@fosstodon.org @vijaybarve @omshivaprakash @shrini @sortee
3/
You may also check this self-assessment tool developed by a German research group (https://road2openness.de/en/
), which aims to help institutions develop/improve their various Open Science practices
Replying to
@mizoraman @jeroenbosman @brembs @HeidiSeibold @carlmalamud @openscience @vijaybarve@fosstodon.org @vijaybarve @omshivaprakash @shrini @sortee
2/
Institutional Open Access policies only: a comprehensive guide to good practices for drafting OA policies produced by @petersuber, a global registry of OA policies https://roarmap.eprints.org/cgi/search/advanced
Some examples of various Open Science policies beyond Open Access (at institutional, funder, national levels) you can see in this list: https://bienflorencia.github.io/rda-sharc-reco/mapping_tools/os_policies.html
🧵
The full #UK #OpenAccess policy for #REF 2029, along with a summary of the consultation that informed it, has been published today, with no mandate for longform outputs such as books
Replying to
@mizoraman @petersuber
You may also look at the UNESCO toolkit for developing policies for Open Science https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000383710
An interview with #Altmetric discussing their decision to include #Bluesky as an attention source and whether they plan to cease indexing #X https://shorturl.at/lmwi8
“we’ve noticed that...the number of X mentions are slightly going down…we have recently run a survey…75% of our users that responded to this survey are either not using X or see their usage decreasing…However, we still see a number of discussions about research happening on X…So..there would be no reason for us to stop indexing X”
