RE: @0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange
>Looking for a new proof
>Ask model if the math is true or bug
>Model doesn't understand
>Pull out illustrated diagram of what is true and what is bug
>Model laughs, "it's a good proof sir"
>Open proof
>It's bug
Self-aware spacetime clump. Senior keyboard masher. Code wrangler. Cat scritcher. Kiddo chaser. Somewhat tired. Adequate cook. Halifax/Kjipuktuk denizen. Mostly lurking.
∆v = vₑ∙ln(m₀/m₁)
RE: @0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange
>Looking for a new proof
>Ask model if the math is true or bug
>Model doesn't understand
>Pull out illustrated diagram of what is true and what is bug
>Model laughs, "it's a good proof sir"
>Open proof
>It's bug
Next time anyone claims they're using LLMs for "minor cleanup" or the like, send them this (from Google no less!)
"We find that even when LLMs are prompted with expert feedback and asked to only make grammar edits, they still change the text in a way that significantly alters its semantic meaning."
Alright erryone, what's your preferred (incremental) remote backup? Is it still Tarsnap?
I'm from Edmonton (Alberta), my family's there, and I hate these fucking Alberta independence people with the fire of ten thousand suns
https://www.thestar.com/opinion/star-columnists/im-an-albertan-whos-been-covering-donald-trump-for-10-years-i-went-home-to-write-about-the-independence-movement-i-was-terrified-by-what-i-saw/article_2a003f93-2769-4509-97bd-5b03e841c966.html
> The sigstore string present in the file indicates the implant also submits a Sigstore provenance attestation to a transparency log after publishing.
I've been wary of any kind of automated "provenance", because anything that's automated can be hijacked, and cryptographic assurances which reduce to "it was built in our CI runner" are pretty useless