Replying to
@xinit@mastodon.coffee
As a NoScript user, if you remove JS there is almost no web left for you too navigate.
Not sure if that's good or bad, though 🤔
@gumnos@mastodon.bsd.cafe @dillo@fosstodon.org
Remote
Olivetree
@olivetree@ieji.de
mastodon 4.7.3I'm an IT professional that likes FOSS, #linux, #rustlang, #selfhosting and have a general DIY/builder personality.
I prefer/try to keep anonymity, at least for now.
Profile image is a Nova fractal
17 Followers
95 Following
8 Posts
Joined July 16, 2025
Pronouns:
He/Him/His
Replying to
@yuki2501@masto.hackers.town
Start doing this now so you start on easy mode. Not in a game, but in real life.
Replying to
@nileane
Because his post completely removes the "verify" part of it. It's the equivalent of the current websites that ask people if they are over 18, but if the kids are under a device (properly) locked by the parents they can't just click yes.
It gives *the parents* another tool, easy (non-technical) and free, and in these days, that's a good thing.
It's not the ultimate tool, but it also doesn't invade anyone's privacy nor is fascist.
Replying to
they are still successful and going strong.
So it's one of those "programming is just a tool" companies. I will never know if that's a better, worse or simply different view from "programming is an art, it must be curated".
so, I'm trying to learn and use #emacs and #orgroam, but I can't get rid of the warning of transient >= 0.13 requirement automatically, i.e. starting fresh with just an init.el, I always need some manual step to ensure the built-in version is overwritten. `package-install-upgrade-built-in` change rigorously nothing, same for `unload-feature+require`, `package-upgrade` and `use-package :pin gnu` or any combination of them I could make sense of. The only solution is M-x package-install and *clicking* the right package and then install. Anyone out there that can and is willing to help?
Replying to
@mrchimp@cupoftea.social
Isn't that the same thing in the end? The number of plays is probably even more fair. If you listen to one artist 1000 times they should get more than one you only listened to once.
And once you do that with each individual customer, it's mathematically the same as putting everything in a pot, isn't it?
@Landsil@infosec.exchange @jonhicks@mastodon.social
Replying to
@mrchimp@cupoftea.social
Ah, but that's not a problem with the pot method, it's a problem with the theft method.
But I was wrong, it's not at all the same, it would only be the same if all users had the same amount of listens. 9$ divided by 2 is not the same as 18$ divided by 100 because another user listened to 100 artists.
@Landsil@infosec.exchange @jonhicks@mastodon.social
Replying to
@cwebber@social.coop
Does she at least output more than she used to by at least the work of a junior? (Even if the ai junior will never learn to become senior)