Replying to
@bsi@social.bund.de Ich würde ja anstelle von kundenportal-unternehmen.de kundenportal.unternehmen.de (oder auch eine login, service oder konto Subdomain) erwarten.
Remote
missingno
@missingno@social.vivaldi.net
mastodon 4.7.3+vivaldimod0 Followers
0 Following
26 Posts
Joined November 20, 2022
Webseite:
Replying to
@Bundesregierung
IP-Adresse wenn DSGVO: Persönliche Daten! Achtung! Mit äußerster Vorsicht zu handhaben! Nutzer muss über die Speicherung informiert werden und zustimmen!
IP-Adresse wenn VDS: Ach, kann man schon anhaltlos für ein paar Monate speichern.
Replying to
Replying to
@Bundesregierung Warum es dadurch potentiell noch teurer wird: https://www.danisch.de/blog/2026/03/26/die-naive-spritpreislogik-der-bundesregierung/
Replying to
@TechieNotNetie@social.vivaldi.net @Vivaldi@social.vivaldi.net
"One of the most controversial web browsers, as far as user-agent strings are concerned, is Opera. The default user-agent string for Opera is the most logical of all modern browsers, correctly identifying itself and its version."
This is the way!
Replying to
@TechieNotNetie@social.vivaldi.net @Vivaldi@social.vivaldi.net I understand that. And I understand the decision to change the default UA string so less techy people won't complain about the browser being broken when it is the faulty website. However, even then Opera was singled out and actively sabotaged by some websites/webservices delivering broken code to it. (So there was also the option to mask it as another browser.) But as you can see, there are still people believing (changing Sec-CH-UA to wave the Vivaldi flag) in an open web. I used to use a user agent switcher extension (doesn't work anymore) and had it set to "Vivaldi/x" without too much trouble. I know Twitter didn't like it, but mostly I didn't experience any issues. Having a temporary debugging option available but no way to set the user agent string to a clean Vivaldi is just weird. It doesn't have to be the default - just give Vivaldi enthuisasts the option, even if it might lead to some broken websites.
Replying to
@TechieNotNetie@social.vivaldi.net @Vivaldi@social.vivaldi.net
Why isn't there a "clean" UA string for Vivaldi?
Instead of
"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/146.0.0.0 Safari/537.36"
(even with the Sec-CH-UA browser identity HTTP header set to Vivaldi) do
"Vivaldi/7.9 (Chrome/146.0.0.0)"
maybe add the OS? At least as an option. I seriously doubt it but if there are any websites outside there that still require a "Mozilla/5.0" they should be updated and/or avoided. I get that the Chrome-part might be relevant (it shouldn't), everything else is just stupid and wrong.
Replying to
@m37ir@mastodon.social You can install and use @Vivaldi@social.vivaldi.net as standalone version on a USB device.
https://help.vivaldi.com/de/desktop-de/installieren-und-aktualisieren/standalone-version-von-vivaldi/
Replying to
Replying to
@Vivaldi For a new computer running Windows basically everything I can and that I don't identify as a driver software or similar. For a new (Android) phone anything I don't recognize (and am able to uninstall) plus some of the (Google) apps I don't ever use.
Replying to
@Labonitamascota Wie man's nimmt. Sozialverträgliches frühes Ableben könnte auch sehr sinnvoll sein ...
Replying to
@hrx@mastodon.online According to this (https://social.vivaldi.net/@TechieNotNetie/116402568097737684 and the setting's description) you should not touch that setting unless doing some debugging. Also it doesn't work; at least not for me or the normal UA string I get.
Replying to
@gothpanda@pandapla.net That is not correct. Opera back in the days didn't do it, more exotic browsers (Lynx) don't do it.
Yes, it started because sites did checks to serve different HTML code to different browsers (which is wrong by itself), messing with browsers that would have worked fine with the "Mozilla"-code. It is *not* expected. Like I said, any website that still does this kind of thing is pretty much outdated by decades and should be fixed.
Replying to
@Bundesregierung@social.bund.de "Warum brauche ich eine grüne Plakette auf meinem Auto, wenn ich bereits ein E-Kennzeichen habe?"
Weil es E-Kennzeichen auch für Verbrenner (PHEV) gibt!?
Replying to
11 % wäre so gesehen sogar jede 9. Person.
Replying to
@bsi@social.bund.de "Sonnenschein123" ist nach eurer Definition aber mindestens in der Grauzone.
https://www.bsi.bund.de/DE/Themen/Verbraucherinnen-und-Verbraucher/Informationen-und-Empfehlungen/Cyber-Sicherheitsempfehlungen/Accountschutz/Sichere-Passwoerter-erstellen/sichere-passwoerter-erstellen_node.html
"S0nn€Tag" wäre mit 8 Zeichen und der Verwendung von Klein- und Großbuchstaben, Sonderzeichen und Ziffern schon okay, "Sonnenschein123" ist fast doppelt so lang.
Replying to
@bsi@social.bund.de Dass Prepaid-Tarife in der Regel bessere Konditionen im Ausland haben sollen, halte ich für groben Unfug. Wenn ihr gemeint habt, dass man sich im Zielland besser eine Prepaid-Karte holt, damit man günstig und ohne Auslandsgebühren unterwegs ist, ist es merkwürdig formuliert. Aber der eigenen SIM-Karte eine Auszeit gönnen kann nicht schaden, zumal selbst eingehende Anrufe im Ausland mit Kosten verbunden sein können.
Replying to
@jon@social.vivaldi.net @Vivaldi@social.vivaldi.net I still would like to have an option to identify the browser as Vivaldi and not another Mozilla-yadda-yadda-Chrome-Safari.