Replying to
@briannosek@nerdculture.de what about "peer", the same as in peer review. If they have no special authority, no special access to materials, no special whatever, they are colleagues..
Remote
Marco Biella phd
@marcobie@hachyderm.io
mastodon 4.7.3postdoc, for now.. open science forevah!
decision-making, cognitive science, behavioral economics, research methods and psychometrics. 
& R bilingual.
hacking mentality 
and linux 
enthusiast.
development 
currently in basel, switzerland.
49 Followers
159 Following
2 Posts
Joined November 18, 2022
Replying to
@melissaekline@mefi.social @arlen@mstdn.social @hye@glammr.us @briannosek@nerdculture.de this is a great idea! i'd rather do that than serve as a classical reviewer..
[QUICK EDIT] i remember Roger D. Peng's course in which he talked about the "reproducible" badge for a journal related to biostatistics. there, one person from the editorial team tried reproducing the whole analysis pipeline when it was shared along with the data.