Replying to
@hye@glammr.us @briannosek@nerdculture.de I think there’s something to framing the role and process as approach (v. avoidance) oriented for the researchers whose work is being checked/audited — the potential for a positive outcome (e.g., a “gold certification”) as opposed to relief. In general, it seems to me positive reproducibility and audit outcomes aren’t celebrated/recognized enough