jan Anja(); // moved to @cybertailor@deadinsi.de

@LaF0rge this is a symptom of corporate takeover of Linux. No sanctions target Linus or the foundation directly, but American companies seemingly want to avoid toxic association with sanctioned Russian companies. The common people suffer when powerful people fight.

@lispi314@udongein.xyz @bedast@beige.party @howisyourdog@cupoftea.social @sidereal@kolektiva.social @grvsmth@lingo.lol in podcasting it's somewhat common to publish text transcripts

@LaF0rge @dg3hda although the law was passed to increase pressure on other kinds of international non-profits, it's written in such broad terms that contributing to Linux is now technically a crime

@Gargron@mastodon.social having something like Proudhon's Bank of the People would be great

@dg3hda @LaF0rge "fun" fact: contributing to Linux is technically a crime in Russia

@dee@grafana.social should I complain about this problem being immanent to the system that privatises profits and socialises losses?

@douglasvb@mastodon.social Breaking Bad

@a @liamvhogan @jenn Usenet obviously (in the derogatory sense)

@lordnikon @kde Gwenview

@virtuous_sloth@cosocial.ca @eieio@mastodon.gamedev.place I guess downloading a Linux package delays the point of risk to after the actual installation but it's not like people decompile & inspect any software. It's not about "curl | sh", but rather the risk of using upstream-provided packaging. If you install software from your distro's repos, then you only need to trust the developers of this distro not to be malicious or incompetent. And if you think the developers can be malicious or incompetent, then you shouldn't use such distro.

@bison@mastodon.social @nikitonsky@mastodon.online can you add pride flags to this website? for reasons

@lispi314@udongein.xyz @eieio@mastodon.gamedev.place early Unix installations were public-access systems (research labs, universities), this kinda explains it