Jerry Gamblin

If you sized your vulnerability management program on 2025's count, you're already a year behind.

September closed at 14,943 published CVEs. That's up 245.8% on September 2025, and it puts 2026 at 72,812 for the year so far, 105.9% ahead of the same nine months last year. Call it 267 a day.

Worth being precise about where that came from. The five busiest CNAs published 7,063 of the month's CVEs, 47.3%, and September 8 alone carried 1,559, with 965 of them from Microsoft. A lot of this is who is publishing, not what is breaking.

Median CVSS v3.x was 7.3 and the 75th percentile 8.1, across the 12,231 of 14,943 CVEs that have a v3.x score. Another 1,266 only have a v4.0 score and 1,446 have none.

Top weaknesses:
XSS (CWE-79): 1,119
Missing Authorization (CWE-862): 797
Improper Access Control (CWE-284): 610
SQL Injection (CWE-89): 494
Use After Free (CWE-416): 469

Last year's total is not a planning number anymore.

Source: NVD, excluding rejected CVEs
#CVE #VulnerabilityManagement #InfoSec

Last year's record is no longer a ceiling; at August's rate it is a midpoint.

August 2026 closed at 12,291 published CVEs against 3,628 in August 2025, +238.8%. Some of that is who is publishing rather than what is breaking: the five busiest assigners supplied 5,842 of the month, 47.5%, and a single scheduled Oracle release carried 889 CVEs on August 18. Strip that batch out, and August is still up 214.3% from last year.

That puts 2026 at 57,908 CVEs year-to-date, +86.5% year-over-year, running at 396 per day in August against 238 per day for the year so far. 2026 has already published more CVEs than all of 2025 (48,154) and is 9,754 ahead with four months left to count. Last month's post projected that crossing for August 13. It landed on August 10.

What number are you putting in the 2027 plan, and which year did you get it from?

Source: NVD, excluding rejected CVEs

"Do we have detection for this CVE?" is normally the first question after a CVE lands on CISA's KEV list. Six times in ten, nothing public can even tell you.

I checked the 554 KEV CVEs published in the last three years against Emerging Threats Open, SigmaHQ, and Elastic detection rules, counting a hit if a rule file cites the CVE ID. 329 have none. None of Apple's 31. None of Google's 24, every one of those a Chromium bug. Microsoft: 20 of 95.

The split tracks how a bug is reached, not how well it is defended. Network-reachable bugs get network signatures, and a signature carries the CVE number: Apache 9 for 9, then SolarWinds, Ivanti, and Fortinet all above 70%. Endpoint rules match attacker techniques instead, so a browser or kernel bug almost never carries its CVE, even when the EDR catches the attack.

The CVE is the identifier the due date arrives in, the identifier the auditor asks for, and the identifier your dashboard tracks. For 60% of these CVEs, there are no detection rules to track against.

KEV used to be a patch list. Now, for most of what CISA adds, it is an IR list: was this box already owned?

48 of the 73 entries CISA has added to the KEV list since July 1 carry its forensic-triage flag. The 1,630 entries added before that date do not.

When I wrote about BOD 26-04 in June, the three-day clock was the argument. The catalog says the clock was the smaller half. The directive, issued June 10, replaced the flat KEV deadline with a risk table, and its top tier is three days plus what CISA calls "& forensic triage". The directive defines that: "carry out a forensic triage of the asset to assess whether the system is compromised." CISA cited the requirement in June entries, the per-entry flag starts July 1, and CISA publishes which entries carry it.

Your process is at least built for the patch half. The other half is a person opening up the box, preserving evidence, and deciding whether to call it an incident. Two thirds of new KEV entries now need somebody who can make that call inside three days.

BOD 26-04 binds federal agencies. You're outside it, and the flag is CISA's worst-case exposure call, which agencies settle asset by asset. It fires on internet-reachable, automatable, total-impact exploitation, and that's the profile where patching on day three still leaves day one unaccounted for.

If a flagged KEV entry landed on you this afternoon, who makes the was-it-already-compromised call: the patch owner, or IR?

@cR0w@infosec.exchange @nyanbinary@infosec.exchange Maybe not exactly what you asked for but I recently did this: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7496228791048949761/

CVSS fails the first test of a measurement: two people scoring the same bug should get roughly the same answer.

5,564 CVEs published in 2026 carry two official CVSS scores, the CNA's and NVD's (the roughly 12% of 2026's v3-scored CVEs NVD has re-scored so far). 55% land in different severity bands; they match exactly just 10.8% of the time. 1,043 are Critical to exactly one of their two scorers.

Which feed does your queue key on, and did anyone pick it on purpose? I'd bet most of us inherited the default.

Just wrapped up my talk at #BSidesGalway and officially launched VulnRadar!

I built this to show how any team can create a high-fidelity vulnerability intelligence capability for $0 in cloud spend. It’s about shifting from passive consumption to engineering autonomy.

The Highlights:

Serverless: Runs entirely on GitHub Actions with zero infrastructure overhead.

No APIs: Harvests directly from NVD, CVE List V5, and CISA KEV—no rate limits or auth headaches.

Contextual: Uses a simple watchlist.yaml to filter for the specific tech you actually run.

Actionable: Automatically creates GitHub Issues and triggers Slack/Discord alerts.

If you're here in Galway, let’s grab a coffee and talk shop! ☕

Code: https://github.com/RogoLabs/vulnradar

Slides: https://rogolabs.net/Talks/BSides-Galway-Open-Source-Intelligence.pdf

#CyberSecurity #InfoSec #OSINT #OpenSource #VulnerabilityManagement #RogoLabs #BSidesGalway

Version 2 of my CVE Intelligence TA for
Splunk is live on Splunkbase.

I’ve added EPSS probability, CISA KEV status, and SSVC data to the baseline for 327k+ vulnerabilities.

No API keys, zero-config, and pre-joined lookups for faster triage.

Full details and download: https://jerrygamblin.com/2026/04/18/prioritizing-what-matters-bringing-cve-intelligence-to-splunk/

July 2026 closed at 9,775 published CVEs against 3,776 in July 2025, +158.9%.

That puts 2026 at 45,626 CVEs year to date, +66.4% year over year, and 215 CVEs published a day so far this year. July 21 alone carried 1,474 of them, 1,097 of those from Oracle. All of 2025 came to 48,162. 2026 passes it in another 2,536 CVEs, in the second week of August.

When the NVD and GitHub disagree on a CVSS score, who do you trust?

I’m at #VulnCon and built Vuln Anarchy to visualize the scoring gap. This chart shows nearly 1,500 instances where the math doesn't align.

Live Data: https://rogolabs.github.io/vuln-anarchy/
Repo: https://github.com/RogoLabs/vuln-anarchy

When Cisco ended the life of Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna Security), I knew it marked the end of my time there.

So today, I'm thrilled to share that I've joined Empirical Security as Head of Research.

Back to the data, back to building, back home.

https://research.empiricalsecurity.com/research/country-roads-take-me-home

Finding CVEs that technically "don't exist" yet. 🕵️‍♂️

Ghost CVEs are live. A "Ghost CVE" is a vulnerability identifier that’s already popped up in the wild—think GitHub commits or security advisories—but is still listed as RESERVED or NOT_FOUND in official registries like NVD or MITRE.

It catches the threats that are already out there, even if the paperwork says they aren't. 📝💨

Admittedly, there are a lot more sources to add—this was just a quick weekend POV—but I plan on extending it soon.

Check out the latest ghost report here: https://github.com/RogoLabs/GhostCVEs/blob/main/reports/ghost_report.md

#InfoSec #ThreatIntel #OpenSource #GhostCVEs

Mid-year CVE check-in: the first half of 2026 produced 35,364 CVEs. More than any full year before 2024, and more than the program's entire first decade (1999-2008) combined. One every 7.4 minutes.

The counterweight: only 85 of them (0.24%) are on CISA's KEV list. Volume keeps climbing; confirmed exploitation stays rare. The signal-to-noise problem is the story.

Full writeup + reproducible code: https://jerrygamblin.com/2026/07/01/3528/

The "Zero Day Clock" is a Masterclass in Bad Data Science.

I've heard this clock mentioned multiple times at #RSAC this week. It predicts an "exponential collapse" of the time-to-exploit (TTE) toward zero. It makes for a scary keynote slide, but the math is fundamentally broken.

The model suffers from:

Right-Censoring: It ignores that slow exploits for 2025 haven't happened yet, artificially forcing the "average" to zero.

Selection Bias: It only tracks the fastest 1.5% of vulnerabilities and ignores the "long tail."

Administrative Lag: It mistakes the growing NVD backlog for "attacker velocity."

We don’t need hyperbolic "scare-ware" statistics to justify our urgency. Defense is hard enough without distorting the data.

I’ve written a full technical audit on why this methodology fails a basic statistical peer review:

Technical Breakdown: https://gist.github.com/jgamblin/91f7843b62069616c951f32957c921cd

#RSAC #RSAC2026 #Infosec #CyberSecurity #DataScience #VulnerabilityManagement

Vulnerability intel shouldn’t be a luxury.

Next week at @BSidesGalway, I’m launching VulnRadar:
✅ 100% Open Source
✅ Runs on free @github@infosec.exchange services
✅ NO API keys to manage

Good intel is a community necessity. Let’s make it the standard.

#BSidesGalway #CyberSecurity #OSS

March 2026 was a brutal month for vulnerabilities. 🛡️

Here is the damage:
• 6,246 new CVEs (+55.7% Over Last March)
• 169 new vulns per day 🤯
• 7.1 median CVSS severity (High)

The Top 3 Culprits:
🥇 XSS (730)
🥈 SQLi (325)
🥉 Missing Auth (292)

2026 is already up 27% YoY.

Launching LycosAI today.

The wilderness is encroaching. We are holding the line.

Deploying autonomous wolf packs at prefecture scale to secure the rural perimeter where legacy systems have failed.

lycosai.com

April 2026 CVE Stats:
🚨 5,820 New CVEs (+44% YoY)
📊 175/day avg
📈 YTD: 20,991 (+31% YoY)
🔥 Median CVSS: 7.0

Top CWEs:
1️⃣ XSS (588)
2️⃣ Path Traversal (238)
3️⃣ Missing Auth (235)
4️⃣ SQLi (218)

#InfoSec #CyberSecurity #CVE

RE: @gcve@social.circl.lu

GCVE now allows publishing.

February 2026 CVE Growth Report:

YTD (February):
▸ 8,932 total CVEs (+12.4% vs 2025 YTD)
▸ 151 new vulnerabilities per day
▸ +982 more CVEs than 2025 through February

February alone:
▸ 4,619 CVEs (+25.7% vs February 2025)

The @openclaw project has exploded this month. 🛡️

Since I've given it deep local access, I’m tracking its security in real-time.

📈 92 Advisories
🚨 55 High/Critical
🔄 Hourly V5 sync

Link: https://github.com/jgamblin/OpenClawCVEs/
Plot twist: I had OpenClaw build the tracker for me. 🤖

A professor reached out about my 3-year-old CVElk project—it was broken. Spent some time last night fixing it: 4 live data sources, 300K+ CVEs, modern Python CLI, auto-updates.

Always happy to fix old code if it helps! 🙏

github.com/jgamblin/CVElk

2025 CVE Stats Update (October 31st, 2025)
Total Number of CVEs: 39,681
Average CVEs Per Day: 130.53
Average CVSS Score: 6.61
YOY Growth: 22.42% or +7,267 (32,414 CVEs in 2024)

Paid $25 on eBay for a 1943 cryptography book. It arrived signed by LTC George R. Eckman, the Executive Officer of the Alsos Mission, the WWII task force that hunted Nazi nuclear scientists across Europe.

It's going to the U.S. Army Intelligence Hall of Fame. Some books belong in archives. 🔐

I wore a $69 badge from @adafruit@fosstodon.org through BSides, Black Hat, and DEF CON. 10,501 radios, 673 open networks, and someone beaconing 77 fake access points across all 13 channels.

Plus the four rewrites it took to learn that counting addresses is not counting devices.

https://jerrygamblin.com/2026/08/10/10501-radios-in-seven-days-what-a-69-badge-heard-at-summer-camp/

Forget cryptocurrency—let's talk real cryptography! If you're into ciphers and code-breaking, this special on the hidden messages of Mary, Queen of Scots, is a must-watch. https://www.pbs.org/video/cracking-the-queens-code-sp1wq9/

🚨 BLACK FRIDAY DOORBUSTER 🚨

CVE.ICU just got a MASSIVE upgrade: EPSS, CISA KEV, & Risk Matrix.

Our unbeatable price remains: $0.00.

No credit card. No sales calls. Just vibes and vulnerabilities.

#BlackFriday #CyberSecurity #OpenSource

@0x00string@infosec.exchange So many WordPress vulnerabilities!

I just read this essay by Kenneth Reitz, and it’s a powerful, necessary look at the "hidden human cost" of the tech industry.

Kenneth pulls back the curtain on how Open Source can build a career while simultaneously draining a person's spirit. He captures the "identity fusion" that happens when we tie our entire self-worth to our code.

It’s a sentiment that has hit home for me in the past. At times, I've had to wrestle with that nagging internal voice that says, "I am only as valuable as my last project." It’s an exhausting mindset to break—the feeling that your worth has an expiration date unless you’re constantly shipping something new. Reading this was a vital reminder that we are more than our output.

A final note: Kenneth’s story reminds us that these pressures can sometimes reach an extreme. If you ever find yourself struggling with these feelings to the point of feeling unmanageable, seeking professional help is a sign of strength. We are humans first, developers second.

https://kennethreitz.org/essays/2026-03-18-open_source_gave_me_everything_until_i_had_nothing_left_to_give

For years, MITRE, the nonprofit that runs the CVE program, was its #1 issuer almost every month. Not anymore.

GitHub has been #1 every month of 2026. MITRE has slid to about #7.

Everyone says the security world stops for Vegas. Your CVE queue never got the memo.

Ten years of Black Hat and DEF CON weeks, each against the twelve weeks around it: the median year lands 10% below its typical week, but half the years fall between 22% below and 30% above. Average rank: 6.3 out of 13, whereas a random week averages 7.0. No dip, and no spike either.

Who is actually on the vuln queue at your shop this week?

A CVSS score is not a fact about a bug. It is an opinion with a decimal point.

Cross-site scripting is the most common bug on the internet. Here it is scored by 13 different organizations: the same weakness averages about a 3.4 at VulDB and about a 6.7 at Microsoft. Same bug class, same scoring system, more than a full severity band apart.

Most of that spread is really one organization. VulDB sits alone at the bottom while the other twelve cluster between 5.5 and 6.7. So the real question is why VulDB reads the same bugs so much lower.

The biggest reason is not the metric people argue about. It is whether an XSS leaks data at all. VulDB scores confidentiality impact as None on essentially every XSS, treating it as a bug that can alter a page but not read anything. Almost everyone else scores it Low: an XSS can read the page, lift a session token, scrape what the victim can see. That single call is worth about 1.4 points, the largest lever in the whole vector.

VulDB then stacks two more conservative calls on top: it marks XSS as not crossing a trust boundary (Scope:Unchanged) where most others mark it Changed, and it usually requires the attacker to already have some privilege. Each is worth about half as much as the confidentiality call. That is the twist: Scope is the metric the community argues about most for XSS, yet the quieter confidentiality call moves the score twice as far.

None of these orgs is being sloppy. They are applying the same defined metrics to a genuinely ambiguous bug and landing in different places, and no single dial orders them. The number just depends on who holds the pen.

When a CVE carries two different CVSS scores, which one does your program actually use?

#vulnerabilitymanagement #cybersecurity #CVE

It’s official: 48,185 CVEs were published in 2025 (+21% YoY). 🚨

The landscape has shifted. WordPress security firms are now out-publishing Big Tech, and "Patch Tuesday" is now "Patch Every Day."

See the full data review:
https://jerrygamblin.com/2026/01/01/2025-cve-data-review/

The CVE Board January minutes read like a gossip mag for vuln geeks.

Good: The March "funding cliff" is a myth—the lights are staying on.

Bad: Mystery draft legislation wants to force "International Participation" & limit "Organizational Concentration."

Drama: The Board is already at 22 members with no term limits, but they just voted to interview #23.

Full gossip here: https://www.mail-archive.com/cve-editorial-board-list@mitre.org/msg00314.html

I heard you like CVEs, so I reported CVEs in your CVE filing software.

I reported and fixed CVE-2026-35466 & CVE-2026-35467 in CVEClient.

https://github.com/CERTCC/cveClient

2025 CVE Growth Report (Data through Nov 30):

⚠️ Total: 42,697 CVEs (+16.9% YoY)
📅 Daily Avg: 128
📉 November Dip: Monthly volume dropped 25% YoY (3,028 CVEs), the lowest since Jan.

We are still on track for a record year, sitting at +6,187 CVEs over 2024.

PURL was supposed to be the upgrade. A package-native identifier built to describe the open-source packages CPE never handled well. Here is where it actually landed in the CVE feed: about 2% of 2026 CVEs, and most of that from a single third-party CNA.

As CNAs write them, 75% of CVEs carry neither CPE nor PURL. Then NVD and CISA go to work: they backfill CPEs and cut that no-ID pile to 41%. Every point of that improvement is CPE. They add zero PURLs, and not by choice. NVD has no PURL field to fill.

Here is the strange part. PURL is alive and well outside this pipeline, in OSV, GitHub Security Advisories, and every SBOM and SCA tool. It just never made it into the CVE and NVD pipeline that most of the industry still triages from. The problem is not PURL. It is that the feed everyone relies on structurally cannot see it. How long do we keep matching CVEs to assets through a format that cannot name a package?

#vulnerabilitymanagement #cybersecurity #CVE

@0x00string@infosec.exchange Yeah, it's a ton.

London bound next week (Dec 7–15)! 🇬🇧

I’ll be at #BlackHatEU giving my talk on the "Post-NVD Era" (Thurs Dec 11 @ 2:30 PM) and then hitting up #BSidesLDN for the weekend.

#Infosec #VulnMgmt #CVE

CISA added 154 CVEs to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list so far in 2026. Over half landed within a month of publication, but a stubborn 16% were more than three years old at listing.

I measured the gap from a CVE.org record being published to that CVE landing on KEV. Most move fast: about three-quarters are listed within a year of publication. That tracks with how we picture exploitation: a new bug, a quick confirmation, onto the list.

But 16% break the pattern, more than three years old when CISA lists them, including a 2008 Windows bug (nearly 18 years) and a 2009 Office bug (about 17). Listing dates cannot tell us whether that exploitation is new or long-running, only that CISA confirmed it years after disclosure.

#vulnerabilitymanagement #cybersecurity #CVE

Jan 2026 CVEs: 4,319.

While +1.0% YoY looks flat, it's 139 CVEs/day—nearly 7% HIGHER than 2025's average.