idkrn

@siguza@infosec.space one of my biggest problems is what people are willing to sacrifice just to train these systems and how dependent so many people are on it succeeding

@whitequark@social.treehouse.systems what other pr do they have?

@abhiyantrik@mastodon.social @GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social they’ve started numerous times that other companies that depend on Android would inevitably fill in the gaps

@siguza@infosec.space they probably also want everyone to see it in every commit to make people think they’re missing out

@pancake oh I think neovim has support for it https://neovim.io/doc/user/treesitter/ It’s actually super simple. No clue about vim

@pancake you don't use tree-sitter?

@stacksmashing@infosec.exchange Option C: use GrapheneOS

@pancake it’s an easy fix :)

@bugaevc@floss.social calling unwrap() is an explicit choice to panic. It’s not a restriction of the language

@bugaevc@floss.social that’s a mistake allowed by the language. Null deref is UB is it not? Calling unwrap() is explicitly telling the program to panic. It’s not really meant for production use. Think of it like todo!()

@bugaevc@floss.social yes I was using C as an example since I was assuming the reason the post exists in the first place was because of fil c. I don’t entirely agree with the initial post, but unwrap() isn’t the same as forgetting that something can be null. In this case you’re specifying you want a panic. You can basically replace every unwrap() with ?

@cina@fosstodon.org @GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social transparency of what? What do you want them to address?

@Peetz0r@hsnl.social buy a used phone?

@Peetz0r@hsnl.social I think that idea is overblown. Unless the majority of buyers choose a pixel because of the resale value, I don’t think that’s something to worry about

@grsecurity@infosec.exchange you said grsec can be vulnerable “only MODHARDEN has a chance.” What about rbac?

@stacksmashing@infosec.exchange any possibility of a new video for this?

@siguza@infosec.space @nicolas17@social.treehouse.systems @madcoder@infosec.exchange should be fine lsp like things

@abhiyantrik@mastodon.social since other companies also rely on Android, yes

@abhiyantrik@mastodon.social multiple oems competing like that wouldn’t be able to compete with the app compatibility Android has

@l0kod@mastodon.social do you accept donations?

@floriantfw@mathstodon.xyz ARM CPU exception level 3