Vivien (toujours dans le déni)

@vladcampos@mastodon.social @LonM@social.vivaldi.net @eunews@mastodon.social the way I understand it is “we would have loved to make it work with privacy but since there can be fraud there will be no privacy” EDIT: here is what Taler says about the proposal: https://www.taler.net/en/news/2026-02.html

@aeva @shanecelis I thought we peaked in parenthetical puns when lisp was brought to ethereum smart contracts under the name “pyramid scheme” but I was wrong it seems.

@jessuvaleria@mastodon.social The ideal number of litterboxes, pillows, computer monitors and chairs is 1 + the number of cats in the household.

@microsoft that’s the great microslop mentality :caramelldansen:

@TechConnectify The size of the beast though.

@ParadeGrotesque@mastodon.sdf.org cool, but we want digital cash with strong privacy though.

@ParadeGrotesque@mastodon.sdf.org looks like you do not want digital cash with strong privacy. Any reasons?

@ParadeGrotesque@mastodon.sdf.org sorry, this is “digital cash with strong privacy” and a thread discussing these aspects. If you want something else, go make your own thread. Good luck explaining why “same thing as the US but with a different flag instead” matters.

@baleine@piaille.fr this is great :acongablob: :acongablob: :abongoblob:

@infobeautiful@vis.social No Ω though?