(Fedi fellows, can we work together and post with #ESPARG so we can follow the posts as the match happens? without the news spam of #worldcup)
#worldcup2026 #fifaworldcup #fedifc #wm2026
Remote
Bùi Minh Đức
@duc@toot.community
Accidental programmer, YouTube addict, occasional fútbol guy.
26 Followers
422 Following
17 Posts
Joined April 02, 2025
Website:
Bridged to Bluesky:
Open post
Replying to
@staustellsimon@infosec.exchange Both! But I assumed they had an arrangement haha
1
1
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@mlawton@mstdn.social it did! Leading to that was Southgate's sufferball which made England pretty dull. They've always been horrible at PKs and would rather avoid them, but that's 120+ and with Tuchel it takes great effort to go into. But that's how I see it and time will tell if they can reach another peak :)
1
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@mlawton@mstdn.social oh no I've turned into The Sun newspaper editor haven't I? But Southgate-gate was really a thing back in Euro '24 😆
1
1
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@mlawton@mstdn.social 60 years is a generation of footballers away so no one does really.
1
6
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@mlawton@mstdn.social yea - then again Tuchel is a better master than Southgate at pulling the strings. I suppose German efficiency is the missing piece they need.
1
4
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@elCelio @dev @kolya @Mastodon I also believe abuse/harassment reply issue mentioned is valid, regardless of whether you see Mastodon as a social platform or not. Disabling or limiting responses to a post is a good way to address that, though it won’t totally get rid of every opportunity. If you agree to a post, like it. If you don’t, move on. If you find the post disturbing, mute or block the person posting. You don’t need to be able to reply.
https://neilzone.co.uk/2024/12/i-think-fedizens-should-be-able-to-disable-replies-to-some-or-all-of-their-posts/
https://localghost.dev/blog/twitter-reply-guys-were-bad-but-mastodon-is-no-better/
5
1
0
0
Open post
Replying to
5
13
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@dev @kolya @Mastodon I see.
re: plans, in the technical sense, this needs to be implemented at the ActivityPub protocol level first, and while the contributors and maintainers agreed to the idea of reply controls, there are still some roadblocks on how it should be implemented.
FEP-5624: https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/fep-5624-per-object-reply-control-policies/2723
3
2
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@teohhanhui @dev @Mastodon It got stalled, but there are new proposals based on FEP-5624, like FEP-7888, FEP-7458 and FEP-0391. You should check them out near the end of FEP-5624's discussion.
1
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@kolya @elCelio @dev @Mastodon Many problems with this mostly stem from the ability for post authors to abuse reply restrictions (this is true on those other platforms!) But Mastodon primarily constructs feeds from what you follow, so I imagine in most cases it’s someone you know sharing grieving personal news. You already have the options to mute, block or unfollow keywords/authors should you see someone abusing this feature.
I agree granular controls might be helpful if this happens a lot. :)
1
1
0
0
Open post
Brilliant! I hate this so good.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SiloSeries/comments/1vbc075/silo_s03e05_memory_episode_discussion_no_book/
0
0
2
0
Open post
Open post
Open post

