Arne 🌻🌈

@lispi314 @whitequark Also interesting that they claim to use Copilot, which, according to its TOS, must not be used for anything other than entertainment purposes. So apparently, by their own admission, #KeePassXC is now officially a joke.

@partim @larstransportworld I found this diagram in my archive, but it obviously does not show train frequency and I also do not actually know how old it is. Probably newer than the 50s.

@partim Nur sorgfältig und sparsam auftragen. Nicht regelmäßig einsetzen. Kann abhängig machen. Zu Risiken und Nebenwirkungen fragen Sie Ihren Op oder Administrator.

@ell1e @traecer I mean, the article you cite doesn’t even mention the words “fair use”? Just because it’s what *you* are familiar with, doesn’t mean it’s a thing anywhere else.

@ell1e @traecer Strictly speaking, it’s not talking about that: “Fair use” is not a legal concept within that court’s jurisdiction. EU law allows to ignore any and all copyright for “data mining”, and OpenAI tried to argue that since their business is data mining, they never have to care about copyright to begin with. This particular ruling simply says that if your product reproduces lyrics of an entire song, that isn’t just data mining, it is in fact copying. So what the court says is: Under current EU law, you’re allowed to copy as much data as you want for *training* your LLM, but that doesn’t mean you’re also allowed to actually provide LLM as a service to the public. (IANAL) Note that this particular ruling is not legal precedent and it’s already being appealed.

@larstransportworld @partim Yeah, just based on the graphical style of the diagram, some time in the 1980s seems very plausible.

@turmoni @lispi314 Interesting. Upon further inspection, they may have changed that recently, on 5 March? Before that, GH Copilot was “governed by your Microsoft Product Terms”, which I can only assume included non-GH Copilot terms. Either way, thanks for pointing it out.