PlutonicXT

@Drahngis@social.vivaldi.net It should be for parents/guardians to strictly limit what children access online, not for governments to remove everyone's privacy and free speech. And when I see the support for the murders of Palestine's children, or at least lack of firm action, then I see they don't really give a damn about children!

@nitrokey@social.nitrokey.com I give in, tell me.

@MiBaWi@m.ai6yr.org cruel, not amused

@catfishes@mastodon.social @GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social Me too - I love my Pixel / Graphene, trouble-free.

@cmconseils ...drat, "or, is it...."

@digichelle I am using Tuta for a few years. I trust them, they say they don't have debts/investors. I like using Tuta - Desktop client and Android client.

@deane White phosphorous..?

@ZLabe@fediscience.org Why March? What about the other 11 months?

@davidrevoy@framapiaf.org Vy you crop top nice graphics?

@Tutanota@mastodon.social If this is functionally the same as using Tuta in the browser, then is it not less secure than the Tuta desktop app?

@Tutanota@mastodon.social Apart from personal safety, being snooped on is just plain creepy!

@Tutanota@mastodon.social Thank you Tuta for these efforts to bring more people over to our un-google privacy side. But please do look at experts like GrapheneOs on this thread. They express serious concerns about /e/ and others, which you promised to "dig deeper" on - Ref: GrapheneOs and Tuta posts here on Jan.3 last.. Yet I don't see you have removed or clarified some of the questioned reccomendations, including /e/ os.

@Tutanota@mastodon.social Ps; I have enjoyed using Tuta for a few years, questionable slips like I mentioned below make me a bit nervous....

@nitrokey@social.nitrokey.com pc screw sealing to alert us to tampering in transit. Sorry - I don't know the wrong answers.