#scientific

5 posts · Last used 16d

Replying to

11/

  • Those who opt for this extremism in delegating and giving up control of key #technical / #scientific tasks no longer do so timidly, but rather with increasing ostentation, an apparent arrogance which is perhaps instead stentorian theatricality (an analogy made me think a lot, as if it echoed something else deep: in the classic fight-or-flight dichotomy, now the mode might be an overly ostentatious fight ceremony, a colleague observed, almost like in a Batesian mimicry: but fearing what?)
0
13
2
0
Replying to

13/ Blurred spectrum between two refusal ways to disclose #NegativeResults and the process towards obtaining any given "successful" solution

  • #generativeAI companies using these "opaque" solutions as advertising and with goals "severely misaligned" [3] vs. the goals of the #ScientificCommunity

  • #scientific/ #technical experts increasingly adopting an "opaque" process to deliver "successful" solutions, hiding (or simply being more and more unable to keep up with) even the more severe pitfalls

1
11
2
0
Replying to
15/ The declaration continues [3] "The issues the #mathematical community faces now are similar to issues that other #scientific and #creative professions are facing, and indicate issues that all of humanity might face: how to make sure that, as AI changes the way work is done, we do not lose sight of what that work was meant to achieve in the first place" Clues pile up in other fields, with "reliance on" #genAI tools allegedly degrading "the abilities of physicians and software engineers" [4]
2
9
3
0
You've seen all posts