Sofia (19MtF), slut, all-around nerd, and information systems student at UFSM.
Kind of a regressor, it's complicated.
I support MAPs[1], anti-c fundamentalists[2] are antis and should be treated as such.
Youthlib advocate (yes, the above is a nonnegotiable part of that).
There is nothing you can do to stop me from fighting against harmful misinformation, I have too much integrity for that, and frankly, I'm a tenacious bitch.
100% sub/bottom, bi, daddy's little girl (taken) 🥰
1. Contact stance details:
Currently, the harm potentially caused by bigots and general social pressure should be weighed against that potentially caused by depriving the younger person of the relationship, and it should of course be a joint decision. However, unwanted interventions are strictly immoral, due to actively contributing to iatrogenic harm.
In an ideal society, if a moral age of consent should exist (a legal one should not, since even in cases where it may be a problem, criminalization just makes the problem worse) at all (unsure, requires more consideration), it should be no higher than ~8, and even then, there should be case by case exceptions under that.
Age gaps are not relevant if the younger person is old enough to begin with.
2. Defined as someone who believes child-adult sex is inherently (i.e., regardless of the sociocultural/legal context) wrong, or engages in any kind of unwanted intervention against it (as those are part of the problem).
oh no, it sure would be terrible if someone DoS'd abusive parents.... :3
https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/11/1
![💙🩷💜 Brett [he/him/any] (@brettm@swarm.coiloptic.org)](https://swarm.coiloptic.org/brettm/s/c24974b4c6860f65a36b3d048aeac347.jpg)