offray

@Kjaerulv@mastodon.social I wonder if we should measure the amount of AI or #ApparentIntelligence, as I like to call it. Thinking that zuzai or zero AI is a healthy measurement, but also anything below, lets say 5% to 10%. I know that my recent code project has little places done with #ApparentIntelligence but under 5% and I know where such lines are located snd why. Kind of the opposite to #VibeCoding slop many advocate for and practice.

@estebanlm@social.smallworks.eu @uksmalltalk@mastodon.social Hi Esteban and nice to find you in the Fediverse. Regarding [1], the best way I can capture my workflow context is via interactive "emergent" documentation. That's why I invented Grafoscopio and ported to Lepiter once it was available later. After finding different design sensibilities with GToolkit, I'm exploring some ideas in Lua[3] and hopefully they'll be integrated back into Pharo. [1] https://blog.lorenzano.eu/smalltalks-browser-unbeatable-yet-not-enough/ [2] https://github.com/feenkcom/gtoolkit/issues/3024 [3] https://mutabit.com/repos.fossil/cardumem/

@cstross@wandering.shop I wrote an essay draft in my masters (early 2000s) against the Turing test as proof of intelligence. There I said that if a similar approach were taken to study life, we would be assigning life to strawmans as they seem alive enough to scare crows (at least to them). Instead, I proposed an #EcologyOfIntelligence where the key is not imitation but completariety/synergy between intelligences: individual, collective, human, non human, etc.