Iain

@happyborg@fosstodon.org @kornel@mastodon.social Very much agreed! Aside from natural language not being adequate enough to specify requirements clearly, we as humans are notoriously bad at describing things we want, let alone *need*. If we remove human interaction from the whole process, I'm afraid we also lose a large chunk of critical thinking in the sense of "should we actually do this?". LLMs can't do that critical thinking part for us.

@kornel@mastodon.social I’m afraid predictability and idempotency will be things of the past if that ever happens. Switching from one language to another, back and forth for several times, is most likely going to act like a destructive Photoshop filter or image compression, losing more and more details in the process. How can we rely on that for critical business logic or sensitive output?

@kornel@mastodon.social @happyborg@fosstodon.org Just curious about your opinion on that, is that a better problem to have?