Elektrine
Log in Register
Paige Chat Timeline Gallery Friends Email Drive DNS Private DNS Domains VPN Kairo Nerve
Remote

C.B. Aberlé

@cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
mastodon 4.7.2
  • Open on mathstodon.xyz

Corinthia Beatrix Aberlé. Aspiring logician. PhD student in CS/Pure and Applied Logic at Carnegie Mellon University. she/her

363 Followers
83 Following
27 Posts
Joined September 20, 2023
website:
https://cbaberle.com
blog:
https://hyrax.cbaberle.com
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 6mo ago

New blog post up on my website: How Algebraic is Algebraic Geometry? https://cbaberle.com/Blog/How+Algebraic+is+Algebraic+Geometry%3F

This post was the result of me trying to wrap my head around some of the central concepts of modern algebraic geometry and its generalizations from the perspective of someone more at home in type theory, category theory, programming languages, etc. In particular, I've been watching much of the recent work on "synthetic algebraic geometry" with some interest, and also have had a passing interest in the programme of trying to develop geometry over "the field with one element," due to my longstanding interest in the Riemann Hypothesis and the various research programmes it has spawned. If any of that sounds interesting to you, then I hope that this blog post can be as illuminating for you to read as it was for me to write :)

Tagging a few people who I think might find this interesting and/or whose writings on these and related topics have been stimulating to my thinking on this subject: @jcreed@mastodon.social @johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz @thosgood@mathstodon.xyz @dwarn@mathstodon.xyz

Comments, feedback, and criticism are much welcomed! In particular, please do let me know if I got anything wrong! Like I said, I'm very much an outsider to these subjects trying to understand them better for myself.

cbaberle.com

How Algebraic is Algebraic Geometry? - Corinthia Beatrix Aberlé

How Algebraic is Algebraic Geometry? - Corinthia Beatrix Aberlé

52
16
22
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 5mo ago
Replying to
@jonmsterling a minor historical nitpick on this, but one that i think actually makes your point land harder: there have been periods (e.g. during the Italian Renaissance) where mathematics *was* adversarial; mathematicians would closely guard their techniques and regularly attempt to discredit one another (the history of of imaginary/complex numbers is a good example of this). Of course, a key component of much of the progress we've had since then has been precisely the move to our current open, trust-based system, which has allowed mathematics to develop cumulatively rather than adversarially. so adversarial mathematics isn't unprecedented per se, it's just that the precedent is *horrible* and would be negative progress.
35
6
8
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 6mo ago

RE: @arXiv_csLO_bot@mastoxiv.page

New preprint up on the arXiv, applying the theory of polynomial functors in dependent type theory to program verification:

mastoxiv.page

arXiv cs.LO bot: "Compositional Program Verification with Polynomia…" - mastoxiv

14
1
3
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 6mo ago

coimage of a map in an exact sequence: i'm going to become the coker

9
0
1
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 5mo ago
Replying to
@jonmsterling@mathstodon.xyz ACAB (All Corvids Are Beautiful)
5
0
0
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 5mo ago
Replying to
@pigworker @zanzi you were. back when i had two n's in my name where you have one, i was a closeted undergraduate at Oxford dealing with the fact that, due to the ongoing pandemic, I couldn't return home to friends and family and was stranded in a country with an increasingly transphobic media and a 5-year (at least!) waitlist for HRT. knowing there were people like you out there and in my community helped keep me sane.
6
2
0
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 5mo ago
Replying to
@jonmsterling @MartinEscardo fair points, but have you considered
4
1
0
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 11mo ago

My Topos Institute Berkeley Seminar talk "Synthetic Mathematics, Logical Frameworks & Categorical Algebra" that I gave during my internship there this Summer is now up on YouTube! Check it out: https://youtu.be/MjkWT6GkISI

14
0
4
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 5mo ago
Replying to
@maxsnew I tend to think of sheaves in terms of converging processes. To back up, think of a category as a collection of "interfaces" and ways of moving/translating information from one interface to another. Then a presheaf X can by thought of as assigning a set X(I) of "systems with interface I" to each object I of the category, which is compatible with the structure of translations in that you if you have a system with interface J and a translation f : I -> J, you can construct a system with interface I. Now suppose you additionally have a coverage on your category. Informally, what a covering family f_i : U_i -> U tells you is the U_i "converge to" U via the f_i, in the sense that they jointly account for all the "information" in U. Then the sheaf condition tells you that, if you have a collection of systems s_i : X(U_i) that are suitably compatible with such a covering family, then there is a unique system in X(U) which they "converge to" under that coverage.
4
0
0
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 5mo ago
Replying to
@boarders i agree with the overall sentiment, but not with the somewhat gatekeep-y vibe of that quote @pigworker
4
1
0
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 5mo ago
4
1
1
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 6mo ago
Replying to
@simrob@social.wub.site facts don’t care about your priors
5
0
1
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 5mo ago
Replying to
@MartinEscardo *through gritted teeth* working on it! @jonmsterling
3
0
0
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 5mo ago
Replying to
@julesh @boarders amusingly, I managed to take almost all of those prereqs during my UG out of pure interest in the math, without any motivation at the time for understanding machine learning. but i don't think my experience is at all representative of the average CS major (or CS and Philosophy major, in my case).
3
0
0
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 6mo ago

Hyperdoctrine? I hardly know ‘er doctrine!

4
0
0
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 5mo ago
Replying to
@zanzi @pigworker ditto to this
3
1
0
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 4mo ago
Replying to
@mc@mathstodon.xyz @olynch@mathstodon.xyz If you do the usual categorical thing and define (e.g.) the action of substitution on types only up to isomorphism (i.e. as pullback, but without a strictly-functorial *choice* of pullbacks) then you run into coherence issues trying to interpret type theory soundly, since type theory models substitution as strictly associative, whereas it's generally only associative up to coherent iso in categorical models. Of course, you *could* work with strict categories, split fibrations, etc. But then univalence-pilled people will look at you funny.
2
1
1
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 5mo ago
Replying to
@jonmsterling
2
0
0
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 21mo ago
the set of all sets be like: “do i contradict myself? very well, i contradict myself. i am large. i contain multitudes.”
19
0
4
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 6mo ago

i am updating my priors. pray i do not update them further.

2
0
0
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 5mo ago
Replying to
@Klepsis
1
0
0
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 5mo ago

RE: @mc@mathstodon.xyz

Just watched this video all the way through, and it does a very good job of capturing my general thoughts on AI and the discourse around it. Highly recommend to those who have the time/interest to watch! Thanks @mc@mathstodon.xyz for the recommendation!

mathstodon.xyz
1
1
0
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 19mo ago
Replying to

Abstract: Ordered, linear, and other substructural type systems allow us to expose deep properties of programs at the syntactic level of types. In this paper, we develop a family of unary logical relations that allow us to prove consequences of parametricity for a range of substructural type systems. A key idea is to parameterize the relation by an algebra, which we exemplify with a monoid and commutative monoid to interpret ordered and linear type systems, respectively. We prove the fundamental theorem of logical relations and apply it to deduce extensional properties of inhabitants of certain types. Examples include demonstrating that the ordered types for list append and reversal are inhabited by exactly one function, as are types of some tree traversals. Similarly, the linear type of the identity function on lists is inhabited only by permutations of the input. Our most advanced example shows that the ordered type of the list fold function is inhabited only by the fold function.

8
1
6
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 6mo ago
Replying to
@hallasurvivor ty!
1
0
0
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 6mo ago
Replying to
@oantolin thanks for the correction. fixed!
1
0
0
0
Open post
C.B. Aberlé @cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz
· 6mo ago
Replying to
@johncarlosbaez Fixed! Thanks, John!
1
0
0
0
Back
313k7r1n3
Elektrine

Tor hidden service

elekhj7afj4qnrr4yd3bkzslsyo5jgfxw3orgjkhlcxifueodybyiiad.onion

I2P eepsite

j6b6cyk6gjmepjih7jjadxgxvvf3lzzujljuu2v4biemzpg3naya.b32.i2p

Platform

  • Email
  • Chat
  • Timeline
  • VPN
  • DNS

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Lite (no JS)

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
  • Report Abuse
  • Warrant Canary
  • VPN Policy

Support

  • support@elektrine.com
  • Report Security Issue
Mail client setup IMAP mail.elektrine.com:993 POP3 mail.elektrine.com:995 SMTP mail.elektrine.com:465
© 2026 Elektrine. All rights reserved. Server: 04:05:07 UTC