bélître

@joepie91@social.pixie.town @aral@mastodon.ar.al actions that make it more difficult to classify me as good or bad. I guess in some context I do good things, in some other bad thing. When I'm inconfortable in the society I live in, I'm more prone to do things against this society. Could be good if the society is seen as bad, could be bad if the society is seen as good.

@joepie91@social.pixie.town @aral@mastodon.ar.al But philosophically, I see people as the simple result of their "genes" and the environnement they grow up in. I mean when you take your first decision, it was the result of your "state of mind" at that time and of your environnement. Due to that decision, your "state of mind" had change and the following decisions were the result of the previous ones, but I don't see how "you" could have change your state of mind at anytime.

@joepie91@social.pixie.town @aral@mastodon.ar.al So for me, yes, in the absolute nobody is responsible for who he is, and even if it is important that the society punish you if you don't follow the rules, as knowing that will change the behaviour of the majority. So for me the ones for who it is easy to follow the rules are the luckiest one. The ones who are able to follow the rules but with an effort are a bit less lucky. And the ones who are not able to follow the rules, who feel rejected by the other

@aral@mastodon.ar.al It may not be that easy to define, nice, good or bad people. Is it relative to intention, to impact on society ? If nice people were the one not acting, who were the one dragging away ? Is their some study on who were the peopke resisting before they do ? But I agree that people with a bad impact on society in one context could have a good impact in another context. No good or bad, just people lucky to be more adapted to the society they live in.

@joepie91@social.pixie.town @aral@mastodon.ar.al Sorry I'm not able to retrieve the post I respond too (it was more than one year ago). I think we all agree that people not doing to crime and bad things they are aware of are also responsable. That was not what it was about, sorry if my bad English and the absence of context mislead you. The question was in deed more philosophical on how to classify a "good" or a "bad" person. I am certainly a bad because I don't do anything again war crime in gaza, but I hope I may some other

@joepie91@social.pixie.town @aral@mastodon.ar.al In deed that something I question. I guess it's the philosophical "free choice" debate. I agree that depending of the context (the laws or what is considered good or bad by other people) the behaviour of one person can change. So if collectively we evolve to see something as bad, it will make people have "better" behaviour. So as a society we have an interest to juge other people and their action to make them have the best behaviour for the society.