Amos Mulder

@Blender@mastodon.social Trying to making it sound less tone-deaf doesn't make the membership itself less tone-deaf unfortunately. On the contrary I would say...

@Blender I'm not sure what to think about still accepting the money, it's a compromise where I would have loved to see a very clear 'no thanks' to such a harmful company. But I'm happy you considered our feedback and did something with it at least. Personally I hope you can find another way to deal with corporate funding in the future. I'd rather wait a year longer for a new version of Blender than seeing some of these mega(maga)corps like google and meta on the fund.

@mxchara @Blender As far as I'm concerned Blender is great software and the fact that it's made by a community makes it even better. Of course there's quite a learning curve, but that's not different with all comparable 3D software. There is no easy fix if you want all the control 3D software offers. Lot's of people are putting in the hours and make great work with Blender. If you want instant results this kind of software is not for you to begin with I guess.

@bartgroothuis@mastodon.online @jasper@hachyderm.io Leuk, maar het risico van deregulering lijkt me dat dan uiteindelijk zowel de buitenlandse als de binnenlandse dataverwerkers er met onze data vandoor gaan.

@openculture@toot.community "AI slop reflects less the ill intent of (or at least neglect by) the powers that be than the undemanding nature of the public." Well, I for one think the use of AI slop to illustrate your article reflects a disdain for your public. But maybe that makes me too demanding?

@ylegall@genart.social great stuff!

@bert_hubert@eupolicy.social Absurd!

@mhwombat@mastodon.social @Danpiker@mathstodon.xyz Interesting, I see both effects.