Replying to
@mattblaze @jeffjarvis @mmasnick The only explanation that seems to fit the data:
Musk:Twitter::Thiel:Gawker
Remote
PeoriaBummer
@PeoriaBummer@infosec.exchange
mastodon 4.8.0-alpha.3+glitchTech ethics and policy, CS education, tabletop games, indie rock, guitar, and gardening.
0 Followers
0 Following
10 Posts
Joined November 18, 2022
Twitter:
twitter.com/PeoriaBummer
Replying to
@mingo@oldbytes.space @kathygriffin@mstdn.social Still zero. I’ve been cautious but mostly lucky.
@StefanThinks@beige.party “Sorry I called you David for so long, Greg. To prevent future confusion, let’s go with ‘Gredavid’”
Replying to
@cusick@c.im @jstroik@noc.social @dramypsyd@ohai.social Every journal they submitted their findings to objected on ethical grounds. No, not due to the shady methodology or lack of IRB approval. The results were a Lovecraftian cosmic horror that drove readers to absolute despair.
Replying to
@oetting @mattblaze @jeffjarvis @mmasnick Based on his behavior, he seems to hate the people that work there and the popular users. I don’t know why. It’s hard to psychoanalyze someone who speaks in a mixture of contradictory hype and adolescent memes.
Replying to
@thegrugq@infosec.exchange @thegrugq@mastodon.social I was specifically interested in adopting “OPSEC” as a term. I definitely remember it floating around, but I wanted to know when it entered the hacker lexicon.
@thegrugq@infosec.exchange @thegrugq@mastodon.social
do you know when OPSEC entered hacker culture and how it crossed over? Someone asked me, and I realized I didn’t know. I wanted to get an authoritative answer from the expert.
Is “the usual” none at all?
https://www.theregister.com/2024/08/07/crowdstrike_full_incident_root_cause_analysis/
Replying to
@thegrugq@infosec.exchange @thegrugq@mastodon.social Thanks for answering! I really appreciate the clarification and history lesson.
Replying to
@DJDarren@mendeddrum.org @alistaircoleman@mastodon.social Yeah. This isn’t a financial failure. It’s a moral failure.