Luis/Luigi ☭

@matthieu@mastodon.weber.fi.eu.org @otyugh@pouet.chapril.org @eloquence@social.coop the kernel doesn't really give any interesting info that's why I said go for the real distros name

@matthieu@mastodon.weber.fi.eu.org @otyugh@pouet.chapril.org @eloquence@social.coop why do you want to be more generic? What are you describing? A package installable with apt? An app that needs GNU libraries? One that needs Linux kernel?

@matthieu@mastodon.weber.fi.eu.org @otyugh@pouet.chapril.org @eloquence@social.coop the thing is non-gnu Linuxes should usually be counted for "Linux" in this kind of stats, even if they don't feature GNU components

@matthieu@mastodon.weber.fi.eu.org @otyugh@pouet.chapril.org @eloquence@social.coop Alpine Linux ad I've said in another thread!

@otyugh@pouet.chapril.org @eloquence@social.coop even if terminology may be important, GNU/Linux offers not so many relevant info for the end user anyway. It's only useful for programmers (and mid/low level ones) who wants to know the ABI is GNU's one. For end users the name of the distro itself conveys more info. Or the package manager used. Or the DE...

@otyugh@pouet.chapril.org @eloquence@social.coop as a philosophy/marketing term. I sincerely prefer Linux rather than GNU/Linux given the reputation problems GNU and more specifically Stallman have gone through