@riverpunk@defcon.social I've been going back and forth on this design choice. I think it makes search easier, but also means you have to potentially read several tags to tell if someone might be in your pool. Plus, I know there are folx that identify as, say, FN (but not F and N individually), and I can easily imagine folx who are interested in, say NM, but not M by itself. So I'm still leaning towards overloading a single tag and encouraging people to learn the syntax. You could still easily follow #AF4N, #AN4N, #AFN4N, etc. And it would probably be useful to list the permutations in logical groupings so people can just follow all the ones that apply to them. @Quasit@beige.party