Elektrine
Log in Register
Paige Chat Timeline Gallery Friends Email Drive DNS Private DNS Domains VPN Kairo Nerve
Remote

Cory Doctorow

@pluralistic@mamot.fr
mastodon 4.7.2
  • Open on mamot.fr

By Cory Doctorow (GPG 0xBF3D9110957E5F4C)
@doctorow@mamot.fr.

Archived at pluralistic.net

I post long threads. If you don't like these in your timeline but want to read them, I suggest unfollowing me here and subscribing to my RSS, or my newsletter, or any of my various long-form feeds. Links at https://pluralistic.net.

77098 Followers
968 Following
50 Posts
Joined March 12, 2020
Books:
https://craphound.com
Blog:
https://pluralistic.net
Podcast:
https://craphound.com/podcast/
Latest book:
https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374621568/thereversecentaursguidetolifeafterai/
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1d ago
Boosted by @trending@homestead.social
Well, this is cute. I looked up an #AirCanada flight in Firefox and then pasted the URL into a Chromium window where I was logged into my Aeroplan Super-Elite account. Air Canada added $300 to the flight price when I tried to load it from a logged-in browser. Hell of a customer loyalty perk! I bought the ticket in my non-logged-in window, then added my FF number to it.
406
0
310
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 5d ago
Boosted by @jwz@mastodon.social
"Email Interview" (n): A process by which a stranger commissions you to write several short essays on subjects of their choosing, for free, which then runs under their byline.
139
0
74
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 4d ago
The AI-generated "I'm a really nice person doing good things and I'm writing to you to ask for cash" emails are now coming at the rate of dozens per day.
38
0
20
1
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 2w ago
Today's threads (a thread) Inside: The Claude Delusion; and more! Archived at: https://pluralistic.net/2026/09/21/sunsetting/ #Pluralistic 1/
pluralistic.net

Pluralistic: The Claude Delusion (21 Sep 2026) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

16
5
17
1
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/24
Companies like Facebook make pennies from your private data, and inflict harm on you that totals up to hundreds of times more than they actually make. The commercial surveillance industry are poster children for corruption: concentrated gains that are far exceeded by diffuse harms: https://locusmag.com/feature/cory-doctorow-zucks-empire-of-oily-rags/ But just because privacy doesn't fit well into a property rights framework, it doesn't follow that there's no way to do privacy well. 24/
4
1
1
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/25
We have *lots* of other rights frameworks besides property, and it's taken the concerted work of generations to get us to forget that these rights exist at all. Imagine if our privacy regime was modeled on the human rights system we rely on when it comes to sex, bodily autonomy and consent. 25/
4
3
1
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/27
If we apply a consent regime (not a property regime) to privacy rights, then the entire commercial surveillance industry would cease to exist. There's no way you can give "informed consent" to a laundry-list of terms of service that are as impenetrable as they are lengthy, and even if you did, you could withdraw that consent at any time, and Facebook et al would have to immediately stop processing your private information and disgorge it. 27/
3
1
2
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/20
Think of privacy: the standard for privacy is for you to click through an "agreement" that nominally trade your privacy rights for some product or service. Google spies on you constantly for ad-targeting, you get to see Youtube videos (after watching a bunch of ads). 20/
3
1
0
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/21
This is a catastrophe. Virtually every vendor you engage with, from your landlord to your corner deli, wants you to install an app whose terms of service requires you to sign away *all* of your privacy rights, *forever*, in exchange for *nothing*. 21/
3
2
1
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/26
In this framework, no one is allowed to do anything to you unless you give your continuous, informed consent, which you can withdraw at any time. "I changed my mind" is a perfectly valid thing to say in the middle of a sexual encounter. It's not a violation of your contract. Quite the opposite: someone who ignores your withdrawal of consent is guilty of criminal assault. 26/
3
2
1
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/19
I've been trying this out for six years now, and I think it's a winner. But it was only a month or two ago that I realized there was a way in which the use of "property" can also be used to undermine the bullying, censorship and extraction of corporations wielding their IP. Property rights may be our state religion, but they are also the *worst* tool for several important jobs that need doing. 19/
3
9
0
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/22
You get the same sandwich, but you "pay" more, in the form of all your private data, which is flushed into the unregulated data-broker sector to be weaponized against you in a thousand ways, including higher prices and lower wages: https://pluralistic.net/2026/07/11/your-risk/#my-reward 22/
3
6
1
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/28
Like all forms of property rights, "IP" has severe limitations that can only be addressed by applying a different framework to your disputes. Think of the way that the expansion of copyright has failed creative workers. For 50 years, we've monotonically expanded copyright in every dimension, so that today, copyright covers more works, restricts more uses and inflicts higher statutory penalties. 28/
2
1
1
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/23
Worse: because you have "entered into a contract" to "sell" your privacy rights, anything you do to claw those rights back is violation of your end of the contract. Using a tracker blocker like Privacy Badger makes *you* the cheater: https://privacybadger.org/ Even if you could get *actually* paid for the use of your private information, the sums involved would round to zero. 23/
2
5
1
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/36
They're suing to make sure that the *Times* gets a bigger piece of the action when that happens. If the *Times*, Disney and Warner prevail, they will immediately amend their standard, non-negotiable contracts to require every creative worker who does any work for them to exclusively and irrevocably sign over the right to train AI with our labor, and the resulting models will be used to attack our jobs and wages. 36/
2
1
1
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
A maddening itch between your shoulder blades feels *so good* when you scratch it, and *even better* when someone else scratches it, and better still if that person hits the right spot because they love you and they've done this for you so often and attentively, they know *exactly* which spot to hit. -- If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog: https://pluralistic.net/2026/09/25/other-people/#right-there 1/
pluralistic.net

Pluralistic: Itch scratching (25 Sep 2026) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

3
0
2
1
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 2w ago
Replying to
Long thread/4
Bonta's office *will never have as much leverage over Warnermount as it has today*, when the company is paying a $7m/day "ticking fee" while the merger is stalled (thanks to an injunction secured by the Hollywood unions, whom Bonta has just *royally* fucked, because they can't afford to litigate this case without the AG office's backing). 4/
4
1
1
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 2w ago
Replying to
Long thread/10
This is the "force majeure" clause, which is not like a normal force majeure clause (which allows the parties to back out of their commitment in case of war, wildfires, etc). *This* force majeure clause lets Warnermount tear up the entire agreement if there's a *strike* or a *recession*. So: if (*when*) the Hollywood unions go on strike over this betrayal (which they *absolutely should do*), the agreement becomes null. 10/
3
1
1
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 2w ago
Replying to
Long thread/2
In announcing the settlement, Bonta's office touted a long list of concessions the AG had wrung from the Ellisons before greenlighting this indefensible, illegal and dangerous merger. Every! single! one! of these concessions is *meaningless bullshit*. Bonta just handed the American movie and TV sector to two of the most odious creeps to draw breath, surrendering without firing a shot. 2/
3
1
1
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 2w ago
Replying to
Long thread/7
They made 18 movies last year. Under the terms of this deal, they have "committed" to making *fewer* movies than they make today: https://x.com/BedoyaUSA/status/2102173188557799773 They've committed to not selling the Warner lot. For five years. But they *are* allowed to move it out of LA, which is something my neighbors in Burbank are doubtless delighted to learn. After that, they can move it to whatever state offers them the biggest sweetheart tax deal and the weakest union protections. 7/
3
1
1
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 2w ago
Replying to
Long thread/5
So even if any of these conditions meant anything (which *they do not*), they won't be enforced. If Bonta can't bring Warnermount to heel today, when they have to pay $7m/day for so long as they're crosswise with him, how will he *ever* get them to do shit? He. Will. Not. But it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter! Because the Ellisons have given Bonta *nothing*. 5/
3
1
1
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 2w ago
Replying to
Long thread/9
Guess who chooses the members of the editorial board? *The Ellisons*. As Stoller writes, "it’s downright comical [that] they demanded that David Ellison not corrupt CNN by having David Ellison appoint a board ensuring that David Ellison not do that." But you can ignore *everything* you've just read, because the settlement includes a clause that says they *don't have to do any of the things it says they have to do*. 9/
3
1
1
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 2w ago
Replying to
Long thread/11
And if (*when*) the AI bubble bursts and there's a massive recession, the agreement becomes null. And if (*when*) Trump's War on Oil plunges the US into Jimmy Carter-style oil economic tsunami, the agreement becomes null. As Stoller points out, *12 State Attorneys General signed this piece of shit*. Every one of them is a lawyer, and every one of them has a staff of lawyers. 11/
3
1
1
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to on mamot.fr
Long thread/18
This is the common factor that binds together that mess of legal oddments, from trademark/copyright/patent to nondisparagement and noncompetes to anticircumvention and personality rights. I think this is both true and a powerful framing. It correctly puts IP in the category of "things corporations do to control you and the rest of the world." 18/
1
1
0
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/41
It's precisely because labor rights get workers benefits at their bosses' expense that copyright cannot that we have been subjected to generations of pro-copyright messaging, told that we aren't workers at all - we're small businesses, LLCs with MFAs! Creative workers have been taken for a ride. We've been told that we're not workers, so we shouldn't advocate for labor rights. 41/
1
1
0
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/10
#1yrago The real (economic) AI apocalypse is nigh https://pluralistic.net/2025/09/27/econopocalypse/#subprime-intelligence #1yrago Plenty of room at the bottom (of the tech stack) https://pluralistic.net/2025/09/28/works-well/#fails-well 10/
1
9
0
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/13
My ebooks and audiobooks (from FSGxMCD, Tor Books, Head of Zeus, McSweeneys, Beacon, Verso and others) are for sale all over the net, but I sell 'em too, and when you buy 'em from me, I earn twice as much and you get books with no DRM and no license "agreements." https://craphound.com/shop/ 13/
1
6
0
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/14

Upcoming appearances:

  • #Edmonton: Elbows Up (Edmonton Public Library), Sep 28 https://www.epl.ca/blogs/post/elbows-up-with-cory-doctorow/

  • #Boston: The Post-American Internet: Possibilities for a new internet created by an American Hermit Kingdom (MIT Media Lab), Sep 30 https://www.media.mit.edu/events/the-post-american-internet-possibilities-for-a-new-internet-created-by-an-american-hermit-kingdom/

  • #Boston: Rethinking Our Relationship with AI, Sep 30 (Emtech) https://event.technologyreview.com/emtech-future-2026/detailed-agenda

14/

1
1
0
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to on mamot.fr
Long thread/9
#10yrsago Youtube’s new “offline first” product for India treats telcos as damage and routes around them https://blog.youtube/news-and-events/youtube-go-youtube-reimagined-for-next/ #5yrsago Shelter is a toxic asset https://pluralistic.net/2021/09/27/lethal-dysfunction/#yimby #5yrsago Democrats, health care monopolies, and market failures https://pluralistic.net/2021/09/27/lethal-dysfunction/#luxury-bones #5yrsago Wells Fargo can't stop criming https://pluralistic.net/2021/09/29/jubilance/#too-big-to-jail #5yrsago "Are you calling me a racist?" https://pluralistic.net/2021/09/29/jubilance/#tolerable-racism #5yrsago Debts that can't be paid, won't be paid https://pluralistic.net/2021/09/29/jubilance/#debt 9/
1
10
0
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/11
Friday's threads: Itch scratching; and more! https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic/117333819261181789 11/
1
8
0
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/17

Upcoming appearances (cont'd):

  • #Vancouver: Read, Resist, Repair, Rejoice (Vancouver Writers Festival), Oct 19 https://writersfest.bc.ca/festival-event-2026/01

  • #Victoria: Munro's Books, Oct 20 https://www.munrobooks.com/events/6113620261020

  • #Vancouver: Life After AI (Vancouver Writers Festival), Oct 22 https://writersfest.bc.ca/festival-event-2026/46

  • #Ottawa: Life After AI (Ottawa Writers Festival), Oct 24 https://writersfestival.org/event/life-after-ai

17/

1
1
0
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/16

Upcoming appearances (cont'd):

  • #Hudson, OH: Hudson Library, Oct 7 https://engagedpatrons.org/EventsExtended.cfm?SiteID=3850&EventID=596952&PK=

  • #Calgary: Wordfest, Oct 8 https://wordfest.com/2026/show/wordfest-presents-cory-doctorow-l2026/

  • #Winnipeg: McNally Robinson, Oct 9 https://www.mcnallyrobinson.com/event-18991/An-Evening-with-Cory-Doctorow

  • #Paris: Slow Tech Summit, Oct 15 https://slowtechsummit.com/

16/

1
3
0
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/12
My latest nonfiction book is the internationally bestselling "The Reverse Centaur's Guide to Life After AI," from MCD/Farrar, Straus and Giroux: https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374621568/thereversecentaursguidetolifeafterai/ -- My previous nonfiction book is the internationally bestselling "Enshittification: Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It": https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374619329/enshittification/ 12/
1
1
0
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/38
Like all the Hollywood guilds, the Writers Guild of America has a nearly unheard-of labor right. They are able to engage in something called "multi-employer bargaining," itself a weak form of "sectoral bargaining," which is when all the workers in a sector bargain with all the bosses in that sector. Sectoral bargaining was made practically illegal under the 1947 Taft-Hartley Act, and its last vestiges are to be found in Hollywood. 38/
1
1
0
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/42
We've been told that copyright is *better* than labor rights, because copyright is a *property* right. It puts a price on your work, which means you can get paid. But prices are things we assign to things that are so worthless that we can say what they're worth. The most valuable things in the world aren't property, and describing them as property would cheapen them. Human beings aren't property. 42/
1
1
0
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/19

Recent appearances:

  • How to Think About AI—Before It’s Too Late (Daniel Solove) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0xR3uEgGcc

  • Could Tech Bosses Destroy Life As We Know It? (Politics JOE) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PL4VktU0SgY

  • Are 'AI Apocalypse' Warnings Just Marketing? (What's Left) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXd9HwIE5bo

  • The Real AI Threat Isn’t What You’ve Been Told (The Tea with Myriam François) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vc8It00fRsA

  • Fascists may come after the AI bubble bursts (You&AI) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2WN64aQeYQ

19/

1
1
2
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/43
The fact that we're not property doesn't mean we're worthless, it means we're *priceless*. That's why "murder" isn't "theft of life" and "rape" isn't "theft of sex." Your life and bodily integrity are worth too much to be bought and sold. 43/
1
0
1
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 2w ago
Replying to
Long thread/12
None of the glaring, catastrophic, utterly disqualifying defects in this "settlement" can *possibly* be a surprise to them. These Democrat warriors surrendered to Trump's oligarchs, giving them *everything*, including control over the American film and TV industry for so long as it limps along. They just assumed you wouldn't notice. 12/
2
0
1
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 2w ago
Replying to
Long thread/3
For a breakdown of how *fucking useless* this settlement is, read (who else?) Matt Stoller, whose piece breaking it down is titled "Happy Oligarch Day!" https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/happy-oligarch-day-as-trump-aligned The first thing Stoller points out is that every one of the "commitments" in the settlement only matter if Bonta's office *enforces* them. 3/
2
1
2
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 2w ago
Replying to
Long thread/6
Take the guarantee that Warnermount "will make 30 films" for the next two years, and 32 films thereafter. That's what's been announced, but when former FTC Commissioner Alvaro Bedoya dug into the actual wording, he discovered they are only committing to *distributing* 30 films, and to making *15* films, which they are allowed to *co-produce* with other studios. 6/
2
1
1
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 2w ago
Replying to
Long thread/8
They are prohibited from gouging the theater chains and putting them out of business to promote their streaming business. For three years. After that, they can let 'er rip. Then there's the "editorial board" that will oversee the Ellisons' management of CNN and MSNBC, nominally to keep it from getting the CBS treatment and going 24/7 Great Replacement/Haitians eating dogs/Charlie Kirk funeral pyrotechnics spectaculars. 8/
2
4
1
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/39
But as vestigial as Hollywood's unique labor rights system may be, it was still enough to let thousands of freelancers beat back AI in their writers' rooms. Indeed, they even retained the right to use (or not use) AI if they chose, without any threat to their wages or headcount: https://pluralistic.net/2023/10/01/how-the-writers-guild-sunk-ais-ship/ 39/
0
1
0
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/35
Many creative workers have cheered on these media companies as they chase the AI companies through the courts, and some artists' groups have even submitted amicus briefs on their behalf. But the *New York Times* - a company that has repeatedly used the dirtiest union-busting tactics imaginable against its workers - is not suing OpenAI to ensure that creative workers don't lose wages to AI. 35/
0
1
0
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/34
The studio lawsuits over AI training want to make training a licensable activity so that the studios can get paid for the use of "their" training data to make models that they *absolutely* want to use to fire most of their writers and then knock down the wages of the survivors of the AI layoffs. 34/
0
1
0
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/18

Upcoming appearances (cont'd):

  • #Kilkenny: Kilkenomics, Nov 6-8 https://kilkenomics.com/

  • #Vancouver: Enshittification (Sid Williams Theatre Society), Nov 10 https://www.sidwilliamstheatre.com/events/cory-doctorow-talks-enshittification/

  • #Vancouver: BC Policy Solutions Gala, Nov 12 https://bcpolicy.ca/gala/

  • #Montreal: World Science Fiction Convention, Sep 2-6 https://montreal2027.ca/en

18/

0
1
0
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/40
This is something you can only get with labor rights, not copyright and certainly not property rights. If we limit ourselves to property rights, the only question we need to ask is "Who owns that writers' room?" And since the answer is "the studio" then whatever the studio says goes. 40/
0
1
0
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to on mamot.fr
Long thread/33
It was *studio bosses*, not AI bosses, who wanted to replace screenwriters with AI. These are the same studio bosses who are now suing AI companies for copyright infringement. That's not because the studio bosses want to get rid of AI models or keep them out of the writers' room. They *absolutely* want to fire writers and replace us with AI. 33/
0
1
0
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/37
In other words, the media company/AI company lawsuits are a fight to see who gets the biggest piece when creative workers get eaten for dinner. We don't want either side to win: we want to be taken off the menu altogether. Which is exactly what the Hollywood writers accomplished, and they didn't use copyright to do it. They used something *far* more important and powerful: *labor rights*. 37/
0
1
0
0
Open post
Cory Doctorow @pluralistic@mamot.fr
· 1w ago
Replying to
Long thread/15

Upcoming appearances (cont'd):

  • #Boston: The Paradox of Enshittification and Reverse Centaurs (Harvard Berkman Klein), Sep 30 https://cyber.harvard.edu/events/running-harder-falling-faster-paradox-enshittification-and-reverse-centaurs

  • #Brighton: Digital Sovereignty and the Post-American Internet (Green Party Conference), Oct 3 https://www.openrightsgroup.org/events/digital-sovereignty-and-the-post-american-internet/

  • Virtual: How to govern technology in a multipolar digital world (Connecting Current), Oct 6 https://connectingcurrent.tech/how-to-govern-technology-a-multipolar-digital-world/

  • #SouthBend: An Evening With Cory Doctorow (Notre Dame), Oct 6 https://franco.nd.edu/events/2026/10/06/an-evening-with-cory-doctorow/

15/

0
4
0
0
Back
313k7r1n3
Elektrine

Tor hidden service

elekhj7afj4qnrr4yd3bkzslsyo5jgfxw3orgjkhlcxifueodybyiiad.onion

I2P eepsite

j6b6cyk6gjmepjih7jjadxgxvvf3lzzujljuu2v4biemzpg3naya.b32.i2p

Platform

  • Email
  • Chat
  • Timeline
  • VPN
  • DNS

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Lite (no JS)

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
  • Report Abuse
  • Warrant Canary
  • VPN Policy

Support

  • support@elektrine.com
  • Report Security Issue
Mail client setup IMAP mail.elektrine.com:993 POP3 mail.elektrine.com:995 SMTP mail.elektrine.com:465
© 2026 Elektrine. All rights reserved. Server: 03:10:23 UTC