pjw
mastodon 4.5.18Philosophy lecturer and political activist
Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Specialize in metaethics, ethics, and philosophy of perception. Dabble a bit in political philosophy.
In my spare time I fight (mostly offline) against Israeli apartheid, and, unfortunately, in recent days, against genocide. Also a member of the Footnotes Collective (https://sites.google.com/view/pjwerner/home)
90% post in English, 10% Hebrew
The difference between self-care and selfishness is not nearly as clear cut as self-help gurus and tiktokers would have you believe.
So too with concepts like grit (vs. victim blaming), 'setting personal boundaries' (vs. being unwilling to compromise), and other such ideas.
That's not to say that these ideas are not incredibly important and useful; rather, it's to say that simply describing some behavior as one of them is not some kind of get-out-of-jail-free card.
Limiting one's time reading the news so as not to be depressed all the time? Self-care. Being intentionally completely oblivious to the suffering going on around you? Selfish.
So where is the line? Don't let anyone suggest that the answer to this question is simple.
Anarchists, academics, general interested political folks!:
I'm looking for writings on the importance of political imagination for political progress.
I feel like I often come across this kind of thinking in passing in radical literature (e.g. 'even just asking the question about what a world without prisons might look like itself makes it possible'), but I don't know that I know of an essay or book length defense of its importance. Ideas?
Happy Passover and חג שמח פסח to all. Judaism is not Zionism, and War is not Liberation.
Sometimes people will get up in arms about the criticism of someone doing the right thing for the wrong reasons, but it is important because how we think of a problem shapes what we consider an adequate solution to that problem!
"The Iron Dome has eliminated Israelis’ fear of war.
A technology designed to preserve life has fostered a sense of near-total immunity, turning the catastrophe of war into a tolerable disruption if not a sterile consumer product — something absorbed into daily life with indifference, somewhere between the evening news and a food delivery.
When fear of war recedes, so too does the public’s motivation to bring it to an end. In this environment, technological security does not shorten wars but helps sustain them as a permanent condition."
https://www.972mag.com/iron-dome-intercepting-normal-future/