In 1926, McGill's arts dean urged quotas on Jewish students, writing "the Jewish people are of no use to us in this country." My Hub op-ed on how in 2026, rather than keeping Jewish students out through restrictive admissions, campus harassment and discrimination risk pushing them out.
https://thehub.ca/2026/09/14/a-century-after-keeping-jewish-students-out-canadas-universities-are-letting-them-be-pushed-out/
Michael Geist
Law Professor & Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law
University of Ottawa
michaelgeist.ca | Twitter: @mgeist@mas.to @lawbytespod
French President Macron congratulated Canada for "joining the movement" when Bill C-34's social media ban was introduced. Last week, France's Constitutional Council ruled that its ban is unconstitutional on privacy and freedom of expression grounds. Bill C-34 has the same vulnerabilities.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/08/thanks-for-joining-the-movement-french-constitutional-council-strikes-down-kids-social-media-ban/
Digital sovereignty means Canadian rules apply in Canada. On Lake Ontario, Google and Apple Maps did exactly that: Canadians see Canada's official name. Demanding it defy the U.S. invites platforms to pick whose rules to follow, and the next pick may not be ours.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/09/be-careful-what-you-wish-for-why-asking-google-maps-to-defy-the-u-s-on-lake-ontario-would-undermine-canadian-digital-sovereignty/
This week's A Canary's Song antisemitism conference was exceptional: Lipstadt, Lyons, Cotler and more, worth watching in full. My talk focused on online antisemitism, platforms' failure to enforce their own policies, and Bill C-34.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/09/a-canarys-song-what-antisemitism-reveals-about-the-health-of-canadian-democracy/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Vz4qUnnAlU
Everyone talks about digital sovereignty, but what does it actually take to build a sovereign social network? Gander Social is trying with data in Canadian control and homegrown identity systems. Gander CEO Ben Waldman joins this week's Law Bytes podcast to discuss.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/08/the-law-bytes-podcast-episode-278-ben-waldman-on-gander-social-and-the-challenges-of-building-a-sovereign-social-network/
What does "digital trade alignment" in the Canada-U.S. deal mean? Canada has already conceded on DST and streaming payments. Reversing on news links likely. But what about limits on data governance? C-22 encryption? C-34 age verification? Access to frontier AI?
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/08/digital-trade-alignment-what-may-be-in-play-in-the-canada-u-s-trade-deal/
What does the US$17B Meta settlement mean for Canada and Bill C-34? My post identifies three issues:
1️⃣social media design regulation via the bill or litigation
2️⃣age verification with its error and sovereignty risks
3️⃣privacy treated as an afterthought
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/08/big-money-bigger-design-changes-what-the-meta-settlement-means-for-canada-bill-c-34-and-the-age-verification-and-privacy-risks-that-remain/
The CASE report has the most comprehensive data on Canada's campus antisemitism crisis: 95.7% of Jewish students experienced or witnessed it, 72% self-censor in class, 25% consider dropping out. A week after release, the response has been denial, hate, and silence.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/08/denial-hate-and-silence-the-three-responses-to-overwhelming-evidence-of-canadas-campus-antisemitism-crisis/
Rosh Hashanah begins tonight, 25 years after 9/11 and nearly three years since October 7. After 9/11, three principles took hold: name terrorism, reject collective blame, address harm without sacrificing rights. All three have gone missing since October 7.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/09/the-lessons-of-9-11-we-forgot-after-october-7th/
The government says it has no choice but to act on a ban on social media and AI chatbots for kids. My post argues that there is a choice. Reject harmful age-gating policies that sacrifice privacy and increase surveillance, and get on with effective AI regulation.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/05/government-has-a-choice-why-an-ai-chatbot-ban-for-kids-is-an-even-worse-idea-than-a-social-media-ban/
For all the talk of red lines on cultural sovereignty, Quebec’s streaming law at the centre of the Canada-US trade battle faces a future court challenge with Ottawa almost surely backing the streamers. My post on Bill 109 and the coming constitutional battle.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/08/why-ottawa-will-likely-join-the-u-s-in-opposing-the-quebec-online-streaming-law-at-the-centre-of-the-trade-battle/
Kiva's generation rebuilt their lives on the promise that Canada was different. Canadian Jews increasingly fear it no longer is. The violence only stops when antisemitism stops being a hatred too many have decided they can live with, ignore, or explain away.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/07/the-name-on-the-window-was-enough-the-attacks-on-kivas-and-the-normalization-of-antisemitic-violence-in-canada/
Ontario's Ford government just completed the most significant reform to its access to information regime in decades. It did so retroactively to 1988, without a single public hearing or meaningful debate, and despite explicit objections from the province's Information and Privacy Commissioner. Bill 97, buried in an omnibus bill, passed within weeks of tabling. Justin Safayeni joins my Law Bytes podcast to explain what happened and why it matters.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/04/the-law-bytes-podcast-episode-266-justin-safayeni-on-the-ontario-governments-overnight-evisceration-of-access-to-information/
How to square a deal ending the DST, streamer payments, and the Online News Act with the claim that culture was never on the table? The government has redrawn cultural policy: mandated payments are tradeable, but the sovereign power to regulate culture is not.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/08/culture-off-the-table-what-the-collapsed-canada-u-s-trade-talks-reveal-about-the-carney-governments-cultural-policy/
My Globe op-ed on the U.S.’s two-pronged strategy over data. First, leverage the CLOUD Act to assert jurisdiction over data wherever it is stored. Second, treat responses that involve data localization rules or sovereign AI initiatives as a trade barrier.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/commentary/article-the-us-isnt-happy-about-canadas-quest-for-digital-sovereignty/
The Benotto report on TMU finds red inverted triangles over Jewish student photos, Holocaust minimization, and Shabbat dinners requiring security assessments. Yet TMU’s response is to sideline recommendations with no urgency to address campus antisemitism.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/08/tmuantisemitism/
Bill C-22 has gone off the rails. My post explains how the government scrapped one bad lawful access provision, but created a two-headed monster of mandatory metadata retention and a technical capability mandate that could apply to all digital providers.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/05/the-lawful-access-two-headed-surveillance-monster-how-bill-c-22-went-off-the-rails/
The government's new video claims lawful access "respects Canadian privacy and Charter rights." But it avoids four Bill C-22 concerns critics keep raising: metadata retention, a lower subscriber info threshold, encryption risks, and incomplete oversight.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/05/slick-videos-wont-save-lawful-access-why-the-governments-bill-c-22-defence-avoids-the-charter-privacy-and-security-concerns-raised-by-critics/
For months, Canadian privacy and security experts have been warning about the risks of lawful access. US Congressional leaders have now joined the fight, citing Bill C-22's harm to national security, citing the drastic expansion of Canada’s surveillance powers.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/05/u-s-congressional-leaders-warn-canadian-lawful-access-plans-harm-u-s-national-security-and-economic-interests/
Three years after the Rogers-Shaw merger was approved, the fallout is arriving: buyouts for half the workforce, rising consumer complaints, and a company pivoting toward sports and media. Peter Nowak joins the Law Bytes podcast this week to discuss.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/05/the-law-bytes-podcast-episode-267-peter-nowak-on-rogers-the-shaw-merger-aftermath-and-the-limits-of-canadian-telecom-policy/
The government seems to think that if it ignores potential violations of Charter rights, the issue magically disappears. Its charter statement on lawful access (Bill C-22) says nothing about mandated metadata collection or risk of systemic vulnerabilities.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/05/wilful-blindness-how-the-lawful-access-charter-statement-skips-bill-c-22s-most-constitutionally-vulnerable-provisions/
Heads They Win, Tails We Lose: What Lies Behind the U.S. Trade Battle For Control over Data
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/04/heads-they-win-tails-we-lose-what-lies-behind-the-u-s-trade-battle-for-control-over-data/
I don’t typically add new posts on the weekend. But when the government offers misleading defences of lawful access by citing a non-existent “mere suspicion” standard to justify weakening the protection for access to subscriber information in Bill C-22…
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/04/a-standard-that-doesnt-exist-parliamentary-secretary-for-justice-offers-misleading-defence-of-bill-c-22s-lower-threshold-for-subscriber-information/
The CRTC's Online Streaming Act ruling isn't just a streaming levy. My post on why it likely violates CUSMA by dictating how foreign capital must be deployed in Canada and who must own the result, handing the U.S. the right to impose matching tariffs.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/05/from-levy-to-liability-why-canada-risks-facing-hundreds-of-millions-in-retaliatory-tariffs-due-to-the-crtcs-online-streaming-act-ruling/
Privacy commissioners, civil liberties groups, and privacy experts have all concluded that the current privacy safeguards for political parties are inadequate. My post on how the government is betting no one notices as it limits committee study on Bill C-25.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/05/going-through-the-motions-how-parliament-is-shutting-down-study-and-debate-on-political-party-privacy/
Government used AI to summarize expert reports from its AI consult. I did the same by uploading them to Chat GPT/Perplexity AI to generate new summaries. I found the government consistently softened advice creating an illusion of consensus that isn’t really there.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/02/aiconsultresults/
Social media and AI chatbot bans for kids are fast becoming a political consensus in Canada. But @smgrimes@mastodon.social, who has spent decades working on children's rights and digital policy, sees a moral panic in the making. She joins my Law Bytes podcast to discuss.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/05/the-law-bytes-podcast-episode-268-sara-grimes-on-the-moral-panic-behind-banning-kids-from-social-media-and-ai-chatbots/
Setting Canada’s AI Policy Priorities: My Appearance Before the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/03/setting-canadas-ai-policy-priorities-my-appearance-before-the-standing-committee-on-industry-science-and-technology/
After four days of debate, lawful access heads to committee with risks more exposed. MPs targeting metadata retention, security vulnerabilities, and weakened subscriber info standard. Government's only answer: we're the only G7 without this. Not a defence.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/04/lawful-access-heads-to-committee-the-opposition-found-its-voice-the-government-never-found-its-defence/
Sovereignty preferred, but not mandated: Canadian AI Sovereign Compute program prioritizes but doesn’t mandate data residency, is ok with companies contractually controlled but not owned by Canadians, and must only limit instances of foreign access to data.
https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/ised/en/program-guide-artificial-intelligence-sovereign-compute-infrastructure-program-scip#3a
Data sovereignty is a global structural trend. The U.S. is fighting it by asserting legal access wherever data sits and pressuring countries that try to move their data beyond that reach. The follow-up to my Globe and Mail op-ed catalogues what the 2026 U.S. National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers actually says about cloud computing and data sovereignty worldwide.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/04/the-global-battle-for-data-control-how-the-2026-u-s-report-on-trade-barriers-targets-data-sovereignty-worldwide/
The Heritage committee's new AI report is framed as a way to protect Canadian creators. But its leading recommendation of opt-in consent for all training data would do the opposite, making Canada an outlier and reducing Canadian content in AI models.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/04/ai-without-canada-why-the-heritage-committees-ai-report-could-lead-to-less-canadian-content-in-the-training-data/
My post on the Blacklock's copyright case. The FCA decision comes with a catch: Federal Court's fair dealing and TPM analysis stands as the most thorough treatment of these questions in Canadian copyright law, serving as a roadmap for future cases.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/04/win-lose-or-draw-the-federal-court-of-appeal-overrules-a-key-copyright-case-on-procedural-grounds/
In a year in which AI has dominated much of the news cycle, the story of Anthropic’s Mythos and the cybersecurity concerns may be the biggest story of them all. Jason Miller joins the Law Bytes podcast to talk about Mythos and the AI governance challenges.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/04/the-law-bytes-podcast-episode-265-jason-millar-on-claude-mythos-project-glasswing-and-the-governance-crisis-in-frontier-ai/
AI is one of the most consequential policy challenges we face. In my opening remarks before the Senate TRCM committee, I focus on three critical issues: privacy, copyright, and the need for an AI Transparency Act.
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/04/addressing-the-ai-policy-challenge-my-appearance-before-the-standing-senate-committee-on-transport-and-communications/
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 261: Ian Goldberg on the Privacy Risks of Age Assurance Technologies
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/03/the-law-bytes-podcast-episode-261-ian-goldberg-on-the-privacy-risks-of-age-assurance-technologies/
The AI privacy debate typically focuses on what data goes in. My Globe op-ed discusses the flip side: what AI figures out by reconstructing identities from fragments never meant to be personal data. De-identification, a core part of privacy law, is broken.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-the-privacy-threat-that-ai-poses-isnt-what-it-learns-its-what-it/












































