laund [moved]

@tuban_muzuru@ohai.social @muelsyse@social.tchncs.de and as always, the LLM misses important nuance: A lot of this conflict isn't driven by worries about technical issues or advantages. its driven by emotional attachment in large part from the C side. The recent posts by Asahi Lina show this quite clearly, where serious technical issues are ignored because they're brought up by Rust devs

@tuban_muzuru@ohai.social @muelsyse@social.tchncs.de not really? it still really posits the issue as technical which its not

also i point this out as i find it odd to randomly post llm summaries on others posts. Especially wen they add nothing and instead (incidentally) further a narrative that its about genuine technical issues....

@codecrafters@bsd.cafe ah, so you went to my profile, found out which language i happen to use, and used that to attack a stance which i do not hold, countering arguments i have not made.

and all i did was point out that your post sounds exactly like the gurus you're criticizing and ignores genuine reasons modern languages exist. and i purposefully said "modern languages" and not "rust" here.

and i get accused of things i didn't do and disagree with.

yeah, that makes me feel really welcome.
/s

@codecrafters@bsd.cafe you criticize "gurus" of modern languages, yet this post reads exactly like what those "gurus" say. You talk about modern languages with the same disregard they talk about C, and C with the same zeal they use for modern languages.

@jimmylittle@hachyderm.io json objects are stored as hashmaps or hashtables in most languages, most implementations of which are not ordered as thats extra overhead.

You'll essentially get the json sorted by the hash function result of the key (in simple terms).

you generally don't want to store ordered data as objects, but use json arrays instead which preserve order.

@codecrafters@bsd.cafe as this is a repost, i'll also repeat my criticism:

This is written and sounds exactly like the gurus its criticizing. Its also written in a way which is dismissive to any technical reasons one way or the other.

@mickeymarse@social.gfsc.studio it stands to reason that it would get a new printed version along with the 2024 edition of the language, but that's a guess