Replying to
@petersuber@fediscience.org sad that they used an (hosted) llm for detection of false positive. It means that their results and software toolchain are not easily reproducible 🫠
While I’m rather convinced that llm and the seemingly linked publication increase are polluting science, I wonder if the mean number of citation also increased on the 2023-2025 period. Couldn’t it explain the increase of fabricated citations ?
