Welcome to OnlineSafetyVille (2026 edition). Now with bonus extraterritoriality. #OnlineSafetyAct
Remote
IT and internet lawyer. Sceptical tech enthusiast. RTs and links are not endorsements. All views my own. No tweets are legal advice.
0 Followers
0 Following
8 Posts
Joined January 22, 2025
Blog:
www.cyberleagle.com
Open post
Replying to on mastodon.social
@ispreview@mastodon.social On VPNs, I am reminded of Doctorow‘s Warning 14 years ago. https://www.cyberleagle.com/2014/01/cyberlaw-memes-and-themes-for-2014.html
5
0
1
0
Open post
Replying to
@JamesBaker@social.openrightsgroup.org “The feeling that the House has, and I am sure I speak for all of us when I say this, is that something has gone wrong with the legislative structure that we have in place in this area” (Lord Stevenson). Well yes, but Parliamentarians were not interested in hearing that the design of the legislation was foundationally defective. In the result, it is working exactly as designed.
2
3
0
0
Open post
Open post
Replying to
@JamesBaker@social.openrightsgroup.org Is there a link to the new Kidron amendments? Are they possibly related to the OSAN 10 point plan to amend the OSA?
1
1
0
0
Open post
Replying to
1
2
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@JamesBaker@social.openrightsgroup.org @neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk New Kidron amendments not moved, as I understand it (pre-empted by Amendment 38 passing)?
0
2
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@JamesBaker@social.openrightsgroup.org Lord Bridge, Caparo v Dickman: "It is never sufficient to ask simply whether A owes B a duty of care. It always necessary to determine the scope of the duty by reference to the kind of damage from which A must take care to save B harmless." Tort 101.
0
0
0
0