Null03

@chatcontrol @echo_pbreyer So let me see if I understood: Parlament voted No. LIBE voted No. And then the re vote is marked with 9 days until the expiration date. If this one comes out as a (hopefully not) 'Yes' to mass scanning - then what? It's 2 No's to 1 yes. Then what? Is it accepted, gone through with that answer? Is it marinated in nothing? More votes? Does the two other no's mean absolutely nothing to the point they can just demand another vote? Surely, this is not democratic?

@chatcontrol @echo_pbreyer Already sent and prepared emails for tomorrow. It's the audacity that irks me. Quite literally, what stops us from coming forward and saying, the next day also, "Actually no! I want another re-vote too!" Like, my god..

@chatcontrol Okay so The Privacy fundamental right is just a sentence is a pretty piece of paper.

@chatcontrol@mastodon.social @echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social thank fucking god everyone. Good job. Now mandatory ID is next one to put out for good too.

@chatcontrol Gods, the citizens are truly worth nothing. I am worth nothing, it seems.

@chatcontrol FINALLY SOME GOOD FUCKING NEWS.

@chatcontrol What do we do now?

@chatcontrol@mastodon.social Thank you Joachim and Patrick. Will help with this once more!

@chatcontrol This IS illegal. HOW. *HOW*

@chatcontrol@mastodon.social ahem, Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 12, United Nations Convention on Migrant Workers Article 14, UN Convention of the Protection of the Child Article 16, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Article 17; regional conventions including Article 10 of the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child.

and Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms; Johannesburg Principles on National Security, Free Expression and Access to Information, Camden Principles on Freedom of Expression and Equality. The Right to Privacy in Denmark Submitted by Privacy International and IT-Political Association of Denmark. (Pdf)

@Kurosetii@mastodon.social @chatcontrol@mastodon.social you're welcome friend !

@Kurosetii@mastodon.social @chatcontrol@mastodon.social well, I had sent some replies here. France spoke to me, the Verts/ALE are against. And fabio de Masi is also against. FPÖ are also against, recieved it from Petra Steger. Haven't received anything more yet. Have you gotten anything?

@Kurosetii@mastodon.social someone said here that estonia likes to follow finland's steps. Hopefully we have them too ! 🙏

@Kurosetii@mastodon.social @chatcontrol@mastodon.social It's all a matter of waiting for the rest to publicly reply. To be fair, I've given up trying to change the minds of those already in favor. There's no point. Send to the undecided and the unknown MEPS.

@chatcontrol@mastodon.social — [...] "Online privacy and the challenges posed for our democracies and fundamental rights are largely unknown to the general public. I am therefore particularly grateful to you for being a vigilant citizen. We are counting on your mobilization to raise awareness and increase citizen opposition to mass surveillance. Please feel free to spread the word and encourage your friends and family to write to their representatives at national level as well." Keep the mails to your MEPS.

@chatcontrol@mastodon.social A part from an email from Fabio De Masi, "— [...] Comprehensive and indiscriminate surveillance methods, such as the widespread search of private messages, are highly problematic. They pose significant risks to misuse, press freedom, and the protection of confidential communications.[...]" Part.2

@chatcontrol@mastodon.social From Saskia BRICMONT, — [...] "In general, the Greens/EFA in the European Parliament are at the forefront of the fight against mass surveillance. For example, we have a campaign against biometric surveillance in public spaces, which is often touted by its supporters as a tool to combat child disappearances, but without measuring the impact on societal change that this induces." [...] Part 3.

@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social LETS GOO GOOD JOB EVERYONE!!

@stooovie@mas.to @qbe@chaos.social @ondra@social.unextro.net Patrick even spoke about Minecraft ! MINECRAFT! One thing you could argue is roblox and even then I don't agree with full on age verification on EVERYTHING (besides the ones under the age of 13, 13 year Olds won't be able to access app store to those apps. The same for 16 year Olds for 16 year Olds. Imagine a 16 year old not be able to use the school whatssap group.. or the family group..)

@Kurosetii@mastodon.social We are currently at 22% and they are around 55% with 15 countries. They need above 65% for the law to even be consider to pass because it also matters the MEPS voting. Malta's government is in favor of the law yet all MEPS are against. I have hope that this won't go through. Let's hope for Germany and Estonia to be on our side.

@Kurosetii@mastodon.social @chatcontrol@mastodon.social Here's another one. " —[...] Chat monitoring seems excessive. We wouldn't open every letter, violating the confidentiality of correspondence, and would instead search them for AI to identify criminals."

@chatcontrol@mastodon.social Please update the website whenever you can ! 🙏