Goodlucksil

I thougnt it was the Navy, not CIA itself

Before anyone goes on a wild goose chase, this excerpt is on the opening of Chapter 4 instead of 5 in the first edition. Anyone surprised to find that public domain art is determined to be AI generated does not realize that feeding an LLM requires a lot of art, and public domain is the easiest one to come across. AI detectors, as far as I know, check AI signs, and (most) AI signs came from their use by public domain artworks.

JD Vance’s birthname is actually James Donald Bowman. When he was 6, her mother remarried and they changed their name to James David Hamel. Since his mother divorced again (this woman married a lot of times), JD changed their last name to Vance in 2013. Source: apnews.com/…/election-2024-republicans-vice-presi…

This is not a false dichotomy because of FPTP

Science is applied mathematics. Better make it just the big M

Misogyny makes you think all your worthy enemies are male

RAID: Restricted AI Data AHCI: Actually Human-Controlled Information

CalyxOS (when it existed) supported Fairphone, Motorola (some) and Pixel.

No you're just qualified

Bold of you to assume they are paying for a license

Iirc google only pays Mozilla for a. Having google as the default search engine and b. Avoiding antitrust lawsuits.

I can think of a few that aren't war related, but they are either kinky, depressing or dystopian.

I don't think all of them should run a single distro. Linux is quite diverse by design. As long as they don't pick Red Hat or anything based in Fedora (which is pretty much Red Hat). I would love SUSE, but oh well

If you don't like GNOME, Ubuntu officially supports other, less resource-intensive DEs, like Lubuntu, Kubuntu or Xubuntu

AT's ddos is because of personal reasons.

~~Hitler~~ Palpatine's personal guard is literally called the *Stormtroopers* (in German Schutzstaffel, better known as S.S.) Edit: read zaphod's comment below.

Place age-verification on routers and keep it there.

I don't see how the above exchange is misandry

That's not the point of humanoid robots....

Well, good luck to the conservatives, because if that happens little (or not so little) Timmy will bike to their nearest friend and ask them. That's how urban legends used to bk propagated

Wait, the guy at the top of the chain asked human verification, not age verification...

I don't know, maybe not looking stupid

It's a monthly podcast

I just keep all my AppImages on a favorited folder...

Isn't is weird that being prejudiced against women is often called misogyny and being prejudiced against men (like in the case above) is also called misogyny?

(Bold mine) This seems like me to claiming prejudice against men happened in the parent comments.

For me the top response is Hacker News...

Then they'll go private and we'll have a cabal

Offline children doesn't imply poor children, same as middle-class doesn't imply always online. I was referring to middle-class offline children.

AI generated code cannot be copyrighted, can it? Then it can be relicensed as GPL.

GNOME isn't exactly light, is it? And there's still a few more variants.

Where is this quote from?

I think admins are the ones that are paid by reddit.

Especially Weird Al Yankovic

Ok, but I wasn’t the one implying Wikipedia editors as a group are biased.

They grew up in an oppressed environment and couldn’t develop their own personal preferences (what did I just write?)

*pixelfed

Me: as a group You: everyone Groups usually cancel bias. And the leftover bias is not “easily notable”

I trust Wikipedia because I edit on it, and I have no will to continue this conversation.

Presentism at work. Jefferson died around 200 years ago

Yes, because the “easily-notable bias” is just a result of discussions done at different times to different evidence, and claiming bias is an overgeneralization.

Probably from the university (CUNEF) themselves, given that they’re private.

Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth says: This page in a nutshell: Any material added to Wikipedia must have been published previously by a reliable source. Editors may not add content solely because they believe it is true, nor delete content they believe to be untrue, unless they have verified beforehand with a reliable source. Verifiability is as important as truth. But reliable sources are biased! From WP:BIASED (Wikipedia:Reliable sources#Biased or opinionated sources). Wikipedia articles are required to present a neutral point of view. However, reliable sources are not required to be neutral, unbiased, or objective. Sometimes non-neutral sources are the best possible sources for supporting information about the different viewpoints held on a subject. (Bolding mine) But reliable sources are chosen by biased contributors! OP attached to their comic repost RSP columns. Deutsche Welle: Reliability was never discussed in an RFC. Anyone complaining here of bias does not acknowledge their possibility (if they are not banned) of making an RFC on it. Voice of America: Discussed on RSN a few times. The last one is pretty interesting: Here Xinhua: Discussed here. ITT: It’s quite old, but Xinhua is very controversial. Telesur: Discussed here around seven years ago. Quite conclusive, I would say.

Iirc you can get your DS saves into an SD if the DS is modded

A lot of whites vote blue. I can almost guarantee this is either indiscriminate or targeting blue voters

I think it’s that Chinese gamers are much more likely to use Windows and that sampling is random so whenever too many Chinese computers are selected on sampling the Linux share decreases

Type less numbers. Or one would name versions by their compilation timestamp. You wouldn’t want 20261002112036.

Metals can be recovered and recycle from smashed technology

Work or school

Few journals criticize Apple (and Apple doesn't reveal these things that often) and the rest have no mandatory certification.